You are making this up. Hallucinating may be a more proper word. The predicate for Tancredo nuking Mecca is the nuking of major American cities.
I personally think Tancredo's solution is wrong. If NY, DC and LA are nuked by Muslims, I am going to shoot off strongly worded notes to Mosques and Madrassas around the world telling them that they hurt my fellings. Along with your strongly worded notes I think we can change some hearts and minds.
"I personally think Tancredo's solution is wrong. If NY, DC and LA are nuked by Muslims, I am going to shoot off strongly worded notes to Mosques and Madrassas around the world telling them that they hurt my fellings."
No no no - you should call your elected UN representative (ha-ha), and let them convene a Security Council meeting where they can discuss the correct words to use. You wouldn't want to hurt their feelings with a mean letter, it might make them angrier!
Post 43 has been pulled so I will put this here.
If asked "What should the response be if a nuclear device is used against us by Islamic terrorists?", 98% of us, myself included, would have thought "Nuke 'em."
Anyone who thinks they are above that response may have forgotten how the fate of 4 planes united this country or a member of MSM who wants us to forget.
I cannot fault or criticize Tancredo for this, he is saying what most of us think.
Also, there is a reason Britain has been targeted so many times in such a short period of time: the response factor. I have a feeling the terrorists know Bush still means what he said post 9/11. We will hunt you down.
As for what would have happened had Tancredo been President on 9/11-not much different than with Bush. He still would have the susual suspects on the left to deal with. Their quest for power is not dependent upon what Republican is sitting in the Oval Office.