Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurker

You had not given a thought to the 30,000+ Americans living in Saudi Arabia, you had no clue about existing treaties, and there is no "abrogation" simply because you say so.

Rep. Tancredo has not given a thought about our 30,000+ citizens and troops stationed in Saudi Arabia, and he has no idea that there are treaties in effect, as he runs his mouth about nuking the country.

Just some more examples of the idiocy surrounding the whole notion; a fool of a Congressman being lauded by Internet keyboard generals.

I'm sure that these radical Muslims in Saudi Arabia will allow us to quietly remove our citizens without objections or obstacles of any kind prior to our detonating one or more thermonuclear weapons in their nation, specially considering the fact that Rep. Tancredo is promoting his idea of a solution.

Beauseant!

347 posted on 07/25/2005 9:04:49 PM PDT by Lancelot Jones (Non nobis, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: Lancelot Jones
We've closed our bases in Saudi. The civilians could leave any time they want to.

Then after the next 'holy warrior' attack, we turn that black rock into dust. We wouldn't even need a nuke. One MOAB should do it.

And by the way, the Saudis aren't 'allies' by any stretch of the imagination.

L

354 posted on 07/25/2005 9:59:07 PM PDT by Lurker (" Many are already stating that the decision in Kelo renders the contract null and void.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson