[bayourod]

..."attacking Mecca, Median, Damascus, Tehran and any other target is acceptable.... "

Just because most of the citizens in those countries are Muslims? There are many Christians in Lebanon and Iran as well as moderate Muslims who do not support the terrorists.

If you want to kill all Muslims if we are attacked with dirty bombs, are you willing to first personally kill Muslim women and children in your neighborhood before you demand that our young people in uniform kill innocent women and children overseas?

[Chgogal]

Who are these moderate Muslims? Do you see them voting? Do you see them kicking out their rabid Imams? Do you see a decline in their giving to "charitable" organizations?

In Southern Thailand, 740 Thais have perished at the hands of Muslims since January 2004.

"If you want to kill all Muslims if we are attacked with dirty bombs, are you willing to first personally kill Muslim women and children in your neighborhood before you demand that our young people in uniform kill innocent women and children overseas?"

If my family is attacked I will defend myself against the attackers. If those attacking my family are Muslim women and children they will be dealt with.

If the US is attacked by MUSLIM TERRORISTS, who by definition are attacking innocent American civilians in US cities, then civilian locals in Muslim countries that support MUSLIM TERRORISTS such as Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran and Pakistan should be targets for a response in kind if not greater.

There is a historical parallel. Fascist Germany attacked civilian London. The Allies returned their kindness with Dresden and Berlin. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. After hundreds of thousands of casualties we returned their kindness with Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

The same will hold true for MUSLIM TERRORISTS who have support through their governments and religious institutions, who attack innocent US civilians in their cities with dirty bombs. Period.