Replies

Do you really believe that a terrorist attack on our major cities would be that devastating, or are you just employing hyperbole for political reasons?

If you are sincerely concerned why don't you join in the efforts to prevent such attacks.

Last week the Secretary of Homeland Defense testified before two Congressional committees that the Southern border can only be secured against terorists if they enact certain immigration reforms.

But Tancredo has sworn to block those reforms because he wants to keep the hysteria alive for money raising purposes.

Where do you stand? Are you really serious about defending against terrorism in America or are you willing to sacrifice American cities for Tancredo's fund raising operations.

The time top choose sides is now. Whose side are you on?

"Do you really believe that a terrorist attack on our major cities would be that devastating, or are you just employing hyperbole for political reasons?"

Tancredo was asked specifically about nuclear attacks! Are you and Mr. Pitts complete idiots? Honestly.

Yes, I do believe if there are dirty bombs set off in NYC, Chicago, LA, Houston, San Fran, Atlanta and Miami there will be a devastating effect on the local economies, the national economy and then the world economy. You must be an complete fool. Look what the relatively minor 9/11 attacks (as compared to dirty bombs going off) did to the US and world economies. You and Mr. Pitts are fools.

We know that the US found videos showing MUSLIM TERRORISTS experimenting with WMD. The US government has found evidence that MUSLIM TERRORISTS are in pursuit of nuclear bomb material (dirty bombs). Remember Mr. Padilla was arrested at O'Hare coming back from an all expense paid holiday in Pakistan. He had instructions on him to blow up apartment buildings using dirty bomb material. We know that the Saudi, Syrian, Iranian and Pakistani governments support terrorism in one way or another.

I stand by my response. If MUSLIM TERRORISTS attack the US with nuclear bombs knowing the support the aforementioned governments give MUSLIM TERRORISTS, attacking Mecca, Median, Damascus, Tehran and any other target is acceptable.

I noticed that your went from nuclear attack to "terrorist attack". Also we are talking about the US response in case of a nuclear attack, not the immigration issue. I have lost all respect for your debating skills.