To: cubreporter
Your prose betrays all the ominous signs of erudition.
Aside: How does one respond to Post #1 when it's been removed?
103 posted on
07/23/2005 3:32:18 PM PDT by
Buck W.
(Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
To: Buck W.
Aside: How does one respond to Post #1 when it's been removed?
Beats having the post pulled, at least the felines get to eat.
-Eric
110 posted on
07/23/2005 3:36:33 PM PDT by
E Rocc
(Anyone who thinks Bush-bashing is banned on FR has never read a Middle East thread >:))
To: Buck W.
wow ... good question. It's kinda like those philosophical type things ... too heavy to think about on a Saturday.
114 posted on
07/23/2005 3:38:14 PM PDT by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: Buck W.
one cheats, by replying to #2, but substituting the cut'n'pasted UserID of the thread's originator in the "to" line
117 posted on
07/23/2005 3:38:59 PM PDT by
King Prout
(and the Clinton Legacy continues: like Herpes, it is a gift that keeps on giving.)
To: Buck W.
Aside: How does one respond to Post #1 when it's been removed? Reply to #2, just remember to change the name in the "TO" block.
Helpful hint... never be the #2 post on a ZOT! thread. You'll get all kinds of weird replies!
192 posted on
07/23/2005 5:42:33 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: Buck W.
For the umteenth time...Cubreport did NOT author this article. Check the author before to make sure you know who you are referring to.
210 posted on
07/23/2005 7:40:53 PM PDT by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know! :))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson