Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AliVeritas
according to one lawyer familiar with events who spoke on condition that he not be identified

I always know to trust these kinds of sources

4 posted on 07/23/2005 5:19:17 AM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fml

...according to one lawyer familiar with events who spoke on condition that he not be identified.

What was that about the LA Times supposedly forbidding the use of anonymous sources?

5 posted on 07/23/2005 5:27:06 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: fml
Translation:

1. "There will be NO indictments under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982." and

2. "There must be SOME reason that the New York Times' Judith Miller is still in the hoosegow."

Question (still unanswered): did Wilson appear before the Grand Jury or talk to investigators?

'cause Wilson is so incredible that if it was high noon on a sunny day and told me the sun was in the sky, I'd have to look for myself.

7 posted on 07/23/2005 5:32:43 AM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: fml

Care to bet he even exists ?


28 posted on 07/23/2005 6:39:36 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson