Posted on 07/22/2005 4:33:39 PM PDT by Pikamax
Aslam targeted by bloggers Background to the story Dilpazier Aslam leaves Guardian
By a staff reporter Friday July 22, 2005
MediaGuardian.co.uk
Rightwing bloggers from the US, where the Guardian has a large online following, were behind the targeting last week of a trainee Guardian journalist who wrote a comment piece which they did not care for about the London bombings. The story is a demonstration of the way the 'blogosphere' can be used to mount obsessively personalised attacks at high speed.
Within hours, Dilpazier Aslam was being accused on the internet of "violence" and belonging to a "terrorist organisation" - both completely untrue charges.
One blogger appealed for "some loyal Briton to saw off your head and ship it to me". Another accused Aslam of being guilty of "accessory before the fact to murder."
These ravings were posted alongside more legitimate questions as to whether a newspaper should employ a reporter who belongs to a controversial political group linked to the promotion of anti-semitic views.
Aslam's comment piece was about the attitudes of angry young Muslims in the north of England and headlined "We rock the boat: today's Muslims aren't prepared to ignore injustice".
It did not mention that the author was a member of the radical but non-violent Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir, proscribed in Germany and Holland as anti-semitic.
Scott Burgess, a blogger from New Orleans who recently moved to London, spends his time indoors posting repeated attacks on the Guardian for its stance on the environment, its columnists such as Polly Toynbee, and its recent intervention in the US presidential election campaign.
He pitched into Mr Aslam, who as it happened, beat him to the traineeship on the Guardian. Googling the 27-year-old Muslim's name, Mr Burgess picked up some articles the journalist had openly written in the past for Hizb ut-Tahrir websites and denounced him on his blogspot, The Daily Ablution, saying: "He is on record supporting a world-dominant Islamic state."
Another blogger, Laban Tall, wrote enthusiastically that Burgess' coup "has resounded across the blogging universe like a shockwave from a supernova".
He said: "I bet the Guardian wish they'd given him the job now, not Mr Aslam. Scott applied for the job in June 2004. Mr Aslam got it. They say revenge is a dish best eaten cold."
Mr Burgess fished out a website article written by Mr Aslam before September 11 for Hizb ut-Tahrir. He quoted one line: "Establishment of Khilafah [the worldwide Islamic caliphate] is our only solution, to fight fire with fire, the state of Israel versus the Khilafah state."
A fellow blogger, Dsquared, promptly accused him of using quotes out of context. "It is more than four years old, written when the author was a teenager, before 9/11 and during a really nasty episode early in the intifada. How many people posting on this blog would like to have their teenage scribblings used as an assessment of their politics as an adult?
"The way you've used these excerpts is a bit spintastic and if this is the worst you can dig up, I don't think the Guardian can be blamed for not rumbling him."
But meanwhile, New Jersey undergraduate Joe Malchow [aka Joe's Dartblog] was writing on his own blog: "Guardian employs known member of terrorist organisation."
Fantasies like this zoomed round the world and soon seeped into the paper's mainstream rivals.
Perhaps the most extreme blog was posted by "dreadpundit", a right-wing New Yorker using the name "Bluto". He wrote: "Okay, Dilpazier, I've decided to bow to your 'logic' - sauce for the goose and all that. That's why I'm issuing a secular fatwah and asking for some loyal Briton to saw off your head and ship it to me (use Fed-Ex, please, so I can get a morning delivery, and do remember the dry ice, also, a videotape of the "execution")."
In the Independent on Sunday, Shiv Malik, also briefly a Guardian intern, accused the hapless Aslam of mounting "a sting by Hizb ut-Tahrir to infiltrate the mainstream media".
And in the tabloid Sun, their attack-dog columnist, Richard Littlejohn, took the opportunity to claim: "A Guardian journalist has been unmasked as an Islamist extremist".
Many bloggers repeated Malik's untrue assertion - made in the Independent on Sunday - that the Guardian was "refusing to sack" Aslam.
The episode was a striking illustration of the way that blogs and bloggers can heat up the temperature and seek to settle scores - as well as raise legitimate concerns about journalism and transparency - when something awful happens in the streets of London.
You got to admit, that was pretty extreme.
Fed Ex from London to New York? Do you have any idea what something like that COSTS?
I'd LOVE to see the letters to the editor from Brits re Aslam for the same timeframe as rhe American bloggers spoke up!
Notice how they say nothing about Aslam's current beliefs. Very interesting.
Aside from this bitter article, the other two
http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,1534493,00.html
http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,1534592,00.html
does cover the fact he refused to renounce anything on the Tahrir website.
"Notice how they say nothing about Aslam's current beliefs. Very interesting."
More teenage scribblings, no doubt.
$125.00.
For that kind of money, you could almost fly commercial and take it as carry-on luggage.
It would be nice to read all the blogs that pop up about killing Americans that link to a Guardian story. I bet the average would make these few examples look like a drop in the bucket. Even a BBC TV guy wrote DURING the war that what was on TV and what was happening in person was 180 degrees from the truth, but the BBC and the Guardian push these stories. A lttle pay back especially revenge served cold is wll earned by conservatives.
Pajamahedeen - 1
Mujahedeen - 0
The look on the bagggage screener's face would be well worth the difference in price.
And so the snivelling coward quit? Hey, jihadi-wanna-be: if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.