So you now admit it, anyone who "bad-mouths" their Presidents decision-making 'in public' must be 'fools and trolls'.
This kind of dogmatic loyality is common on the left, where every leftist who every questioned leaders were labeled as 'traitors' and, even if the criticism was warranted, was unacceptable because 'the evil rightists' would use it against them.
This kind of suppression for 'party discipline' belongs in the dark ages. And many dissenting leftists became conservatives precisely because we allowed diverse thought and were more loyal to a cause than to a man.
Fine, carry on your 'cult of personality' of uberleader. My loyality is to conservative/libertarian ideals. And to the extent Bush fights like a junk yard dog for those ideals I will support him (e.g. in his appointing Bolton, we hope). When he gives in because of personal weakeness or misguided emotions I will express my displeasure.
If you really believe in something other than toadyism, it is your duty to let leadership know...even when the news is not good.
PS I noticed you still havn't checked out FREE CONSERVATIVES... want to prove you're honest and do so?
"Libertarian" that explains everything.