Hey Troll (7/21/05) could you do us a favor and not sign-up yesterday and then start publishing tripe like this 24 hours later.
Here's my theory - Coulter and others are putting on a false front to put you libs in a false assurance that Roberts could be trouble. The fact is I want a SCJ that is an originalist (i.e. Constitutionalist aka strict constructionist) not a legislating-from-the-bench type.
If I am right about my theory then shortly after Roberts is overwhelmingly confirmed Coulter will write an article about how she had taken a page out of W's and Rove's book and hoodwinked the left. Either way - troll off!
No doubt I could do you a favor and not challenge you to think. There are quite a few fellow conservatives that think like trolls: Ann Coulter, Fred Barnes, NR editorial staff, (etc.)- all of whom are deeply disturbed by Bush's uncertain selection.
I know it is far easier to dismiss all of us here who don't follow every inflection of Bush as gospel wisdom than to follow an argument - but hey, every side has its dogmatists looking for heretics, including ours.
Coulter and others are not 'false' writers - I've read National Review for 30 years and I think your more than a little foolish to suppose they are trolls or phoneys.
Either way, I don't find your dim-witted accusations of 'heretic' to be reassuring as to the quality of our supporters.