He's qualified, and he's the President's choice. Unless there is unethical or criminal behavior in his past (highly unlikely), he should be confirmed. We'll just have to wait and see whether it was a good choice or not.
"He's qualified, and he's the President's choice.... he should be confirmed." - thoughtomator
Why should this ever be so? There is nothing in the Constitution to support your postion.
After O'Connor, Kennedy, and Souter, conservatives should closely examine and probably reject ANY judicial nominee who is reticent about his legal philosophy.