Posted on 07/22/2005 12:02:04 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps
On her Web site, Danica McKellar, the actress best known as Winnie Cooper on the television series "The Wonder Years," takes on questions that require more than a moment's thought to answer.
"If it takes Sam six minutes to wash a car by himself," one fan asked recently, "and it takes Brian eight minutes to wash a car by himself, how long will it take them to wash a car together?"
"This is a 'rates' problem," Ms. McKellar wrote in reply. "The key is to think about each of their 'car washing rates' and not the 'time' it takes them."
Ms. McKellar, now a semiregular on "The West Wing" playing a White House speechwriter, Elsie Snuffin, is probably the only person on prime-time television who moonlights as a cyberspace math tutor.
Her mathematics knowledge extends well beyond calculus. As a math major at the University of California, Los Angeles, she also took more esoteric classes, the ones with names like "complex analysis" and "real analysis," and she pondered making a career move to professional mathematician.
"I love that stuff," Ms. McKellar said last month during a visit to Manhattan after a play-reading in the Hamptons. Her conversation was peppered with terminology like "epsilons" and "limsups" (pronounced "lim soups").
"I love continuous functions and proving if functions are continuous or not," she said.
She may also be the only actress, now or ever, to prove a new mathematical theorem, one that bears her name. Certainly, she is the only theorem prover who appears wearing black lingerie in the July issue of Stuff magazine. Even in that interview, she mentioned math.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Got to kissing, I think.
Depends whether Sue shows up to distract Sam and Brian.
Add more if Jane is wearing a 2 piece swimming suit.
Even more if its a cut off: Ratio of time to clothes is inversely proportional to the wetness of the clothes.
I'd hit it, grab a sammich and hit it again...
I knew a math PhD who got a job high in a large bioinformatics company based on that degree.
Has anyone told you recently that you are a LOON?????????????
If not, consider yourself told.
You got it.
Even if you play the stated problem straight, you can't reach a conclusion with the factors given.
It will depend on the method they use to wash the car. For example, when I used to wash my car, I had a system that would reduce the overall time and effort - I'd use the hose in one hand and a sponge in the other. No soap.
If both boys used this method, they'd need two hoses, and the hoses would need to be from two different houses, because if they both were using water from the same house, the flow would be reduced to each hose, increasing their rate of washing.
Is there anything you people won't find fault with? It was a QUESTION ASKED BY A STUDENT. She's a math TUTOR. I know you're all supergeniuses...that's why you spend all day on the computer mocking those who are actually doing things. Yikes.
Actually, according to my Chemistry instructor, the answer would be 1. You've only got 1 significant figure there to work with, so you can't get any more accurate than that.
That's because it was a question ASKED by a grade school student.
I'm surprised that there's > 130 posts on her, and no-one has mentioned Hedy Lamarr, queen of the Electrical Engineers and inventor of frequency scrambling?
Wonder if "Skunk" is thinking of missile defense systems when playing guitar, and thinking of playing guitar when doing missile defense sytems.. hehe..
A beautiful mind can only make a pretty girl even more attractive :-).
"I love continuous functions and proving if functions are continuous or not," she said.
I was always partial to the continuous, nowhere-differentiable functions myselfthey're infinitely kinky.
oh, yeah, I was studying math. sigh
TS
Actually, in college there was this one girl (sorry, young woman) named Ellanora who I actually managed to exchange numbers with. She called me once -- with a math problem for the test the following day. She didn't go out. She just studied.
TS
She sure adds up in my book!
After seeing her picture, I was suddenly overcome with thoughts of -wise" continuity.
the integral of e to the x (you have to write that out mathematically) = f(u)^n
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.