Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush as Indian R-Day guest?
The Times of India ^ | THURSDAY, JULY 21, 2005 | CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA

Posted on 07/22/2005 9:29:29 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Bush as R-Day guest?

CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA

TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ THURSDAY, JULY 21, 2005 11:14:33 PM ]

WASHINGTON: President Bush will most likely visit India in January 2006, but the $ 5 billion question is whether he will be in New Delhi for Republic Day.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh dropped broad hints that Bush had agreed to make the trip in January, but the two sides are in a tizzy whether he should be there on January 26, a date and an event fraught with enormous implications.

Bush taking the Republic Day salute as the chief guest with the Agni missile rolling past would be a further recognition of India’s nuclear status and a reaffirmation of the U.S-India alliance of the 21st century, which in the eyes of some analysts is what underpins this week’s nuclear deal.

"It will be a powerful symbolic gesture," an Indian official in the Prime Minister’s delegation said before leaving Washington, "but there is an internal debate on both sides on what signals it would send and whether it would be the right moment."

Officials are also leery about pinning the exact day because of the security implications, given the long lead time and the precise geography. One official said nothing had been decided beyond the fact that Bush would make the trip after his State of the Union address on January 20. The visit could well be in early February, he added.

The U.S President reaffirmed his decision to make the visit when the Prime Minister phoned him to thank him and bid goodbye just before he boarded the plane for his return home on Wednesday night, the official said.

The Singh government will also have to take into account domestic political considerations with the Left parties already agitated over the nuclear deal and New Delhi’s growing closeness to Washington.

There is also President Bush’s dislike of pomp and ceremony.

Host of only four official dinners since he took office in 2001, Bush sweated his way through the fifth on Monday, wearing a black tuxedo on a sweltering hot day, only because he had promised the Indian side that Singh's visit would be "grand." The US side seemed to feel such gestures are important to India.

Hours in open air on a cold New Delhi morning watching India’s military machine will be a different proposition altogether.

Typically, foreign guests for India’s Republic Day ceremony have been leaders of friendly countries with modest strategic value. Nigerian President Olesegun Obassanjo was the chief guest in 2000, Algeria’s Abdul Aziz Bouteflika came in 2001 (the day of the deadly earthquake in Gujarat) and Mauritius President Cassam Uteem did 2003.

Iranian President Mohammed Khatami and Brazilian leader Lula da Silva, neither of them American favorites, graced Republic Day in 2003 and 2004 respectively, while 2005 was the time for the friendly neighborhood leader, the King of Bhutan.

But major western powers have always been chary of blessing India’s show of muscle. Britain’s Tony Blair is among those who turned down recent invitations.

However, there is a school of thought in Washington which is pushing for not just recognition of India’s military prowess but also supplementing it. Pentagon officials are already talking of U.S selling as much as $ 5 billion worth of technical and military equipment over the next few years, thanks to this week's nuclear deal.

The Republican President's visit would certainly push things along, especially if it comes on R-Day 2006.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; gwb; india; indiavisit; manmohansingh; parade; republic; republicday
Boeing to offer Super Hornet to IAF

NEW DELHI: Two days after India and the US deciding to strengthen cooperation in nuclear, defence and security issues, American aircraft firm Boeing on Friday said it was in talks with the Indian Air Force and Navy for offering the Super Hornet aircraft for IAF's multi-role combat planes and its co-production.

The F/A-18E/F Super Hornet is in competition with aircraft of three other countries including the Eurofighter of Britain for the IAF's combat fleet, for which the Request for Proposals (RFP) documents are likely to be issued in the next two months.

Claiming that the Super Hornets, which are now being operated only by the US Navy, provided "the latest in advanced technology available anywhere in the world", Boeing Vice President Chris Chadwick said the company was pleased to offer "a premier aircraft that will help guarantee the security of India and its people".

The Super Hornet is the second (Block-2) phase of the Hornet which is flown by eight countries -- the US, Kuwait, Australia, Malaysia, Canada, Finland, Switzerland and Spain.

The fighter is fitted with electronic beaming capabilities, ray radars, day-night strike with precision- guided weapons, besides integrated and networked systems providing enhanced interoperability, situational awareness and support which allows direct communication with the troops on ground or ships at sea.

Replying to questions, Chadwick said "we are just entering into the talks process with the IAF and the industry. Some IAF personnel have flown the aircraft. We think there is a lot of capability for production, India will be the launch customer (if it choses the warplane)".

As per the Request for Information (RFI) document already issued to fighter jet manufacturers, the IAF would initially require 18 aircraft and then transit into co-production.

The Boeing official said the US aircraft major was hopeful of receiving the RFP document soon.

Asked about which of the aero-support systems would Boeing be ready to provide to India, Chadwick said it would depend on the recently-concluded Indo-US Defence Framework and the issue was "premature" at this stage.

"We will enter into discussions with all those who seek this aircraft across the board," he said.

To a specific question whether Boeing was considering joint production or manufacturing Super Hornets in India, Chadwick said "there is no issue at all with this aircraft being manufactured in India. We have co-production (of the earlier version of Hornets) with a number of countries apart from country support"...He said if Boeing succeeded in getting the Indian deal, the Indian industry could build parts of the fighter jet and "we could look at marketing" to third countries as well. But no discussions have taken place as yet on these issues.

Asked about supply of spares for the aircraft, Chadwick said that was "totally subject to US government's releaseability".

He parried a question on what Boeing would do if Pakistan asks for the aircraft saying the company was in discussions with Japan, Malaysia and Switzerland which were looking at acquiring the Super Hornets.

1 posted on 07/22/2005 9:29:33 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Boeing to offer Super Hornet to IAF

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshowbnews/msid-1179977,curpg-3.cms


2 posted on 07/22/2005 9:30:32 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

This would certainly make the security atmosphere in Delhi completely comprehensive and pervasive.

IMO, Bush won't do Republic Day.


3 posted on 07/22/2005 9:33:39 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The article doesn't explain to my satisfaction what is the controversy about Republic Day?


4 posted on 07/22/2005 9:34:25 AM PDT by Crush T Velour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush T Velour

I understand it to mean if Bush is a guest, then we have decided as a nation to throw out lot in with the Indians rather than the Pakistanis.

Him attending would basically be a nearly formal announcement of that.

Anyone who knows, is that correct?


5 posted on 07/22/2005 9:39:59 AM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

oops...that would be:

Throw OUR lot in with the Indians...


6 posted on 07/22/2005 9:40:45 AM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crush T Velour
I think it's the military parade. Think Moscow on Lenin's birthday, with troops and missile launchers rolling by. One of the missiles on display would be the nuclear variety.

It's not really Bush's style.

NFP

7 posted on 07/22/2005 9:44:21 AM PDT by Notforprophet (Democrats have stood their own arguments on their heads so often that they now stand for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Crush T Velour

Well from an Indian Standpoint,having the leader of the Great Satan as your guest on the biggest celebration of India's identity doesn't send the right signals(according to the Commies).For a US president,watching ballistic missiles on mobile launchers & scores of army regiments & tanks march by & that too in a country which didn't sign the NPT may not be politically safe.

Apart from all these subjective factors,New Delhi resembles a fortress on January 26(the whole week around actually)-add GWB as the chief guest,you will need to draft in additional hordes of police & paramilitary forces from other Indian states & probably certain military units as well-Coordinating all that with the US Secret Service ain't going to be cakewalk.


8 posted on 07/22/2005 9:45:22 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Throw OUR lot in with the Indians...

More like asking India to throw their lot in with us.

Let me put it to you think way, after Pakistan, who is Indias second biggest enemy?

And who helped Indias biggest enemy get nukes?

Thats why we want India on our side.

9 posted on 07/22/2005 10:06:17 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crush T Velour
Imagine Bush sitting and wathcing India parade its nuclear capable missiles and the message it sends to others. I don't think Bush will take up that offer. Besides, I'm not sure the Secret Service is going to be keen on the POTUS sitting in open air as tanks and military vehicles pass by not too far away. I know India has a professional military but there is still a chance that some looney might inflitrate the parade and do something.

Not a good idea IMHO.

10 posted on 07/22/2005 10:48:02 AM PDT by Saberwielder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Saberwielder

Wasn't Egyptian President Anwar Sadat assassinated during a military parade? Not a good precedent.

I think the Bush administration is walking a fine line between the Indians and Pakistanis. I don't think President Bush wants to be seen to tip more towards one side or the other. Maybe a lower level administration figure will be sent to New Delhi on Jan 26.


12 posted on 07/23/2005 10:11:40 AM PDT by plushaye (President Bush: W-2-4-4!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: plushaye

Nope, only Heads of state or of government(as was with John Major in the mid 90s) are invited as chief guests for the Republic Day Parade.Bush has both positions,so it will be either him or no one.Settling for a junior official would be seen as humiliation in India.


13 posted on 07/23/2005 9:18:44 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson