Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anniegetyourgun
Why in hell should it be a risk? It wasn't a risk when Clinton appointed Ginsburg and Breyer. Nor would it have been if Bush had appointed Janice Rogers Brown.

Instead we get a guy that Charles Krauthammer believe won't vote to overturn Roe, meaning he would be NOT originalist:

It is almost impossible to imagine Roberts doing something as grand as that. He would not have the audacity. My guess? He upholds Roe, purely for reasons of precedent. And very quietly.

26 posted on 07/22/2005 10:42:07 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky

Dear Ol' Sparky,

I'm with you.


sitetest


27 posted on 07/22/2005 10:44:21 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

They are all a risk.


29 posted on 07/22/2005 12:32:47 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson