Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DEATH OF PROSPERITY (in America)
http://www.investmentrarities.com/bestofjimcook.html ^

Posted on 07/22/2005 1:40:11 AM PDT by Capitalism2003

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: pigdog
Two things...Ben was an uncle of mine a few times removed.

Number two, taxes kill incentive and freebies breed more takers.

21 posted on 07/22/2005 1:47:48 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
In other parts of the world they don’t have to carry this much weight.

I would love to see them point to these parts of the world. We are so much more prosperous than the rest of the world precisely because we do have less weight to carry than the rest of the world.

However, a lot of our prosperity is standing on the shoulders of giants. We are prosperous because in the past we were not so constrained. We could not have developed to this point but for that time in our past.

22 posted on 07/22/2005 1:51:31 PM PDT by hopespringseternal (</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom; pigdog

"How a conflict-ridden, grossly over-populated place with no resources whatsoever gets rich is simple. The British colonial government turned Hong Kong into an economic miracle by doing nothing." -- P.J. O'Rourke in Eat the Rich

http://www.freedomkeys.com/gap.htm


23 posted on 07/22/2005 2:00:26 PM PDT by groanup (shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Did Ben leave you any tips about electricity - or anything else for that matter such as older women:-)

Yes taxes DO kill incentive but the manner in which they are collected makes a monstrous difference as well ... and with the FairTax the collection would be much less intrusive and fairer for the taxpayer. Unfortunately it is hard to see a government operating without revenue.

Back about Ben's time it seems something like that was tried and it didn't work too well.


24 posted on 07/22/2005 2:05:32 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Uncle Ben did have an active interest in women, especially those that could also cook. That seems to have gotten passed down the chain. hehehehe

Man must have sustenance you know, before all else.

25 posted on 07/22/2005 2:11:33 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Well, I'll be hornswoggled ... I didn't know that's what "sustenance" meant.

'Preciate the enlightenment!


26 posted on 07/22/2005 2:25:09 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
He obviously was aware of the dangers of vote-buying with tax money by Congress.

Why would ANYONE even want to go to DC to sit in meetings, make calls constantly and BE CALLED relentlessly?

27 posted on 07/22/2005 2:40:29 PM PDT by alrea (Help Wanted: New Jersey Director of Homeland Security - must be willing performer and handsome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: alrea

It seems that it is imbued into some individuals as a requisite part of their self-image.

Sort of like "the importance of being earnest" but instead "... the necessity of thinking you are superior ..." I guess. You can have your (taxpayer paid-for) staff handle the calls from the "little people".


28 posted on 07/22/2005 2:54:56 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

A real (moral) capitalist would not seek political power (in other words, FORCE) to achieve his goals.


29 posted on 07/22/2005 8:33:48 PM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
Moral capitalist??? That is tough to fit in the same sentence. Frankly I do not offhand recall any such animal being in charge of our government.

Immoral now is different, I can think of a host of them in my lifetime and I been around since the 30s. The one that stuck with me was Andrew Mellon. He was enraged with Ford for paying working men $5 a day. Mellon said common working men had no need for money beyond the necessities of life, food and lodging. He was my type of guy.

30 posted on 07/22/2005 8:45:15 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson