CAIR to GOP: Repudiate Tancredo

WorldNetDaily ^ | 07-22-05 | WorldNetDaily

[NRA1995]

How 'bout we just repudiate CAIR instead?

[wita]

This is precisely where I stand. Repudiate or evacuate, your choice. I however disagree with the notification time.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Those responsible members of the Islamic faith cannot be allowed to ignore or to provide tacit or financial approval to or in support of the actions of those who would invite nuclear disaster into the world.

Declare Islam to be a crimminal organization and NOT a religion, invoke the RICO Act, seize mosques, prosecute Imams and CAIR for crimminal conspiracy and deport their supporters...

[newcthem]

American citizen to CAIR......GET BENT YOU FR*CKIN GOAT HUMPERS!

[ArrogantBustard]

W-88

When you care enough to send the very best.

[ZULU]

"Just wait until the ship is far enough away, conduct a Bikini Atoll test on it. Waste of a good ship, though."

Perhaps we could find an old livestock barge that hauled swine to market.

[rlmorel]

ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

For the jerks at CAIR, nothing is good (or bad) enough for them.

To be clear-I have no problem with Muslims in general, or any that I know in particular. The ones I know are wonderful people, seem to want the same things out of life that I do.

The mouths at CAIR are a different animal altogether.

[ZULU]

Everybody is an individual and every individual reacts differently to things.

The problems I have with Islam is with the Wahhabist philosophy in particular, the apparent lack of outrage or condemnation by the majority of Islamic clerics of these anti-western attacks against civilians, the brutality of the Sharia Law, the intolerance of Islamic states for non-Mulsims in general, the tendency of Muslims to view the rest of the world as a them versus me situation, and a lot of the basic premises of Islam.

I'm sure a good many Muslims merely follow their religion on a personal level and are responsible decent people.

But considering the chaos, cost, inconvenience, destruction, and death wrought on western societies by Muslim fanatics, its very hard to convince oneself that the best solution, the most efficient solution, the cheapest solution, and the most effective solution involves addressing the presence of large numbers of Muslims in the west.

I think it would be most wise to limit, or better yet, forbid, the immigration of any more Muslims into western countries, to deport all Muslims who are not citizens, to very closely scrutinize and subject to intense surveillance all Muslims, Mosques, Madrassehs and Islamic Clerics and, at the SLIGHTEST mere HINT of anti-western or violent action or even words, arrest and incarcerate or deport the malefactors.

We MUST stop this stupid nonsense about political sensitivity which keeps us from identifying the problem and the problem is Islamofascism and its sympathizers. We must stop this insanity about searching people who are obviously not Muslims, and concentrate on checking people of obvious Islamic background at all transportation points, military facilities, chemically plants, etc.

If they don't like it, they can leave. But the primary responsibility of the state in this situation is not to avoid offending sensitivities, but to prevent the kind of mindless slaughter of civilians that occurred in London, Madrid, and on 9-11 - and that means scrutinizing Muslims and their communities. There is no other way.

[chris1]

Me to CAIR:

Go $%^^& Yourself.

[rlmorel]

I don't think we disagree.