Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUST SENTENCED >Two drunk America West pilots
Court TV | July 21, 2005

Posted on 07/21/2005 4:25:03 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast

Pilot Thomas Cloyd sentenced to 5 yrs. in prison. Co-Pilot Christopher Hughes to 2.5 yrs in prison. Both also received a gaggle of other conditions when released.

When arrested at the airport prior to a flight Cloyd had a a breath-alcohol reading of .084; Hughes .091. Both over the legal limit for a drunk driver.

The Prosecutor sizzled them because their defense was they did not operate a aircraft, but as he pointed were ready to board it and operate it.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americawest; cloyd; drunk; dui; hughes; pilot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 07/21/2005 4:25:04 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

"Dumb & Dumber"


2 posted on 07/21/2005 4:27:11 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I wish drivers got these punishments. Just because they aren't going to kill a whole plane of people shouldn't make a difference.


3 posted on 07/21/2005 4:29:02 PM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Cloyd got more time because of priors: DUI and Domestic Violence.


4 posted on 07/21/2005 4:30:20 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast (INNOCENT London Bombing Deaths = 50+ / TERRORIST Gitmo Detainee Deaths = 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast
"Cloyd had a a breath-alcohol reading of .084; Hughes .091. Both over the legal limit for a drunk driver."

Remember that the shift from .10 blood alcohol level to .08 was the result of the prohibitionists at MADD, and not based on scientific evidence. Also, breath-alcohol tests are notoriously inaccurate. They form a reasonable basis for arresting someone and taking them in for a more accurate blood test, but they aren't generally admissible themselves in court. Were there no blood tests in this case?
5 posted on 07/21/2005 4:32:44 PM PDT by Moral Hazard ("I believe the children are the future" - Whitney Houston; "Fight the future" - X-files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

You are supposed to post a link that works to the article


6 posted on 07/21/2005 4:34:01 PM PDT by don-o (Don't be a Freeploader. Do the right thing and become a Monthly Donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

This is ridiculous. .08 is not very intoxicated. The prohibitionists have been steadily lower the legal limit. The reality is that the vast majority of accidents are caused by people over .18. Talking on your cell phone is the equivalent of driving with a BAC of around .1. These guys should be fired and lose their licenses, etc. But 5 years in jail? This is nuts.


7 posted on 07/21/2005 4:34:37 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard

Weren't these boys chugging until about three in the morning?


8 posted on 07/21/2005 4:35:06 PM PDT by don-o (Don't be a Freeploader. Do the right thing and become a Monthly Donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Where's the link?


9 posted on 07/21/2005 4:37:42 PM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

I thought the legal limit for a pilot on a passenger flight was 0.0%


10 posted on 07/21/2005 4:38:41 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

I agree, they should be fired, but being in the cockpit while over the limit is not a crime. The judge is counting on them not having the cash to appeal.


11 posted on 07/21/2005 4:39:23 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
This is ridiculous. .08 is not very intoxicated.

My understanding (which could easily be wrong) was that for pilots or commercial drivers the language states that you cannot ingest ANY alcohol for 12 hours prior to service and the level is 0.04 to indicate intoxication.

I’ll dig around and see if I can find the article I got that from…

12 posted on 07/21/2005 4:41:05 PM PDT by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

>>>I thought the legal limit for a pilot on a passenger flight was 0.0%<<<

In the past it was 24 hrs bottle to throttle (for us Military types)


13 posted on 07/21/2005 4:44:16 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

I'm pretty sure FAA says NO alcohol within eight hours of flight, most pilots use 12 for safety. This is for action by the FAA, not the courts.


14 posted on 07/21/2005 4:44:54 PM PDT by Ace's Dad ("There are more important things: Friendship, Bravery...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast
That tears it!

Right on, Bender. Those pilots deserve all they get.

I'm so steamed at the court system!!!!

The court system?

Yeah. How dare they not let pilots drink. If Leela didn't belt back a few before she flew, we'd never get off the ground!

15 posted on 07/21/2005 4:44:54 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast
pilots

http://www.courttv.com/trials/pilots/072105_sentencing_ctv.html


Former pilots Thomas Cloyd and Christopher Hughes
were sentenced to prison Thursday.

16 posted on 07/21/2005 4:48:06 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OnRightOnLeftCoast

Being discussed on Court TV now.


17 posted on 07/21/2005 4:48:45 PM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast (Liberal/Leftist Democrats: A firing squad in a circle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ace's Dad

Seems as though the FAA should've been the only authority involved in this case - they hadn't as yet started the operation of the aircraft.

They should've lost their licenses, that's all - plus whatever fine the FARs allow.


18 posted on 07/21/2005 4:51:40 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

It isn't illegal to sit in your car, in the driver's seat, with the engine off if you're drunk, either. But the moment you turn the engine on, you've broken the law---even if you haven't yet taken it out of park. The difference is of course that you have begun the necessary process to drive; you are "operating" the vehicle.

Driving a plane, particularly a commercial jet, is not a matter of sitting in the seat and turning the key. The process of "operation" begins long before taxi or takeoff. It even begins before the engines themselves start. And the entire process requires command of your mental faculties.

So no, I doubt this will get overturned on appeal.


19 posted on 07/21/2005 4:58:25 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I'd have sentenced them to 5 years continuous flying coast-to-coast, in coach seats..middle seats.. on United..only being able to eat what they were served on the plane...only using the rest rooms on the plane...no, wait,..that'd be unconstitutional..it'd be cruel and unusual punishment..


20 posted on 07/21/2005 4:59:29 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson