Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkie2
We need judges, not pre-judges. Up-Chuck Schumer can ask any questions he wants, but how could anyone get a fair hearing if a judge's prejudgment is now prior knowledge?

Judges need to judge each case based on the merits of each case, otherwise, why have judges? Can Chuckie be held in contempt for forcing judges to ask contemptible questions?

Hypothetically, if Bubba had 6 (or even all 9), openings in the Supremes, would the radical left insist that the court MUST HAVE 4 conservatives, 4 leftists, and one spineless swing-judge? Yeah right!

GWB will have something Bubba never had and never will have, and that's a legacy.

27 posted on 07/21/2005 2:49:30 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: SERKIT

Roberts refused to answer questions on how he would rule in particular cases when he was up for the DC court and he will do so again. Chuckie can whine and cry all he wants, he's not going to get the answers to his questions.

His petty character will be noticed however by the public and associated with the Democratic party. He's likely to be joined by Fat Teddy and a few other Dim Senators which is all the better.


30 posted on 07/21/2005 2:53:34 PM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson