[Chgogal]

"He doesn't have one, and you should keep the focus on him and not give him and his kind(islamofascists) propaganda points such as blowing up mecca."

What a bunch of silliness. Let the following news be spread far and wide.

"If Muslim TERRORISTS/FOOT SODIERS attack the US causing worldwide economic upheaval, there will be HELL to pay. It will be God's/Buddha's/Allah's will. The USofA will act out God's/Buddha's/Allah's will by taking out a strategic site that is now unworthy of the hate filled attackers of the USofA which has been blessed by God/Buddha/Allah. The choices will include Mecca, Medina, Damascus, Tehran and any other site God/Buddha/Allah deems necessary to communicate to the hate filled Muslim TERRORISTS that their barbaric behavior demands a heavy burden. The burden demanded will be greater than the horror they perpetrated on the blessed USofA."

[Eagle Eye]

Oh baby, I love it when you talk nukes!

[hoagy62]

While I agree with Rep. Tancredo on this, I had to take the thought just a little further down the trail, as it were.

If we were attacked, and we retalited by vaporising Mecca, Medina, and few other muslim sites....who's to say that oh, Russia, or China, or India, or any other nuclear power (this includes Pakistan) might not like that very much and might instigate a global thermonuclear war?

That possibility does indeed exist, whether we want to believe it or not. If we nuke a major foreign city, even though other nations know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we could vaporize their entire country, they might take offense of us removing islamic holy sites from existence....even if, in the long run, it would benefit them.

That offense might take the form of a bunch of missles headed towards our shores.

Then what?