Texaco Inc. v. Dagher
THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except ALITO, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the cases.
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.
BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except ALITO, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the cases.
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except ALITO, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except ALITO, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except ALITO, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
United States v. Grubbs
SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and BREYER, JJ., joined, and in which STEVENS, SOUTER, and GINSBURG, J., joined as to Parts I and II. SOUTER, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which STEVENS and GINSBURG, JJ., joined. ALITO, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Georgia v. Randolph
SOUTER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, KENNEDY, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., and BREYER, J., filed concurring opinions. ROBERTS, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SCALIA, J., joined. SCALIA, J., and THOMAS, J., filed dissenting opinions. ALITO, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Northern Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. Chatham County
THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Day v. McDonough
GINSBURG, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, SOUTER, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed an opinion dissenting from the judgment, in which BREYER, J., joined. SCALIA, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which THOMAS and BREYER, JJ., joined.
Jones v. Flowers
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SCALIA and KENNEDY, JJ., joined. ALITO, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Hartman v. Moore
SOUTER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined. GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BREYER, J., joined. ROBERTS, C. J., and ALITO, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
So! After 35 signed rulings, 32 count for our purposes; two were previously excluded due to recusals and, of the above, Hartman v. Moore is also excluded due to a Roberts recusal. Besides that, the deviations are as follows:
In Georgia v. Randolph, Roberts filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Scalia. Thomas filed a separate dissenting opinion that no one joined.
In Day v. McDonough, Roberts joined the majority ruling by Ginsburg (!) while Scalia filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Thomas.
In Jones v. Flowers, Roberts issued the majority ruling while Thomas filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Scalia.
So, drumroll please!
Roberts/Scalia: 90.625% (agree in 29 of 32)
Roberts/Thomas: 78.125% (agree in 25 of 32)
After 35 signed rulings in 32 of which all three participated.
And, once again, just for the sake of curiosity:
Roberts/Kennedy: 84.375%
Roberts/Souter: 84.375%
Next installment to post soon after 40 applicable signed rulings!
Arkansas Dept. of Health and Human Servs. v. Ahlborn
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Marshall v. Marshall
GINSBURG, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, SOUTER, THOMAS, BREYER, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
Holmes v. South Carolina
ALITO, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SCALIA, KENNEDY, SOUTER, THOMAS, BREYER, and ALITO, JJ., joined. GINSBURG, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection
SOUTER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and STEVENS, KENNEDY, THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and ALITO, JJ., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined as to all but Part III–C.
eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L. L. C.
THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. ROBERTS, C. J., filed a concurring opinion, in which SCALIA and GINSBURG, JJ., joined. KENNEDY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, and BREYER, JJ., joined.
Brigham City v. Stuart
ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. STEVENS, J., filed a concurring opinion.
Garcetti v. Ceballos
KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and SCALIA, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion. SOUTER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS and GINSBURG, JJ., joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
So! After 44 signed rulings, 41 count for our purposes, with three having been excluded due to recusals.
Of the above 9 rulings Roberts and Thomas were in agreement 100% of the time.
In S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection, Roberts and Thomas joined the majority ruling by Souter while Scalia joined as to all but Part III-C. (so close - d'oh!)
So, drumroll please!
Roberts/Scalia: 90.244% (agree in 37 of 41)
Roberts/Thomas: 82.927% (agree in 34 of 41)
After 44 signed rulings in 41 of which all three participated.
And, yet again, for the sake of curiosity:
Roberts/Kennedy: 87.805%
Roberts/Souter: 85.366%
Next installment to post soon after 50 applicable signed rulings!