[MarcusTulliusCicero]

But that's the point of this article. We don't have a record to analyze and, instead, are left with looking to see if he has any kids and if his wife belongs to any prolife groups. Again, it isn't as if there weren't candidates out there with actual records supporting an originalist interpretation of the Constitution. And while records can be attacked, they can also be defended, which is what the Republican Senators are supposed to do for the nominees of the President of their party. This article doesn't necessarily come down on one side or the other. The whole point is that we've got another candidate who may or may not turn out to be what we were promised. We can hope and pray that he is....but if we're wrong we'll have a very long wait to try to remedy the situation.

[XJarhead]

Have you read any of the opinions he's written? Just because he has not ruled on any hot button issues does not mean that his basically judicial philosophy cannot be discerned from his opinions.

[old and tired]

But that's the point of this article

Truth is, I didn't read the article. I just looked at one of the last posts and responded. Sorry.