[Khan Noonian Singh]

<<
Fact One... The false docs planted in the SOTU address, et cetera, pushed toward war with Iraq. January 2003.

Fact Two... The shoe was only dropped on Pres Bush after the war. Wilson, Wilkinson, et al. July 2003.

Conclussions... The forgers wanted war with Iraq, see Fact One. Howsoever, something happened between Fact One and Fact Two to turn them against Bush.

What did happen between January 2003 and July 2003? The war.

So... If they wanted war with Iraq, but disapproved of the war when it happened, that can means one only thing... They wanted war with Iraq, but later, after tensions were much higher so the level of war would have been strategically much greater.
>>

I just realised...

Also in the same timeframe and be-fore the war... The dud anthrax attack on or close to 24 February 2003.

Just as in theory above, intencion was to incite and inflame war with Iraque, but a delayed war... Delayed until tensions had escalated to much higher level. High enough to trigger a strategicly final response.

All fit the selfsame pattern.

[John Faust]

This brings to mind a Whispering Joke that I once heard.

[oceanview]

the actual combat phase of the war couldn't have been much faster - what "level of war" did they want to see?

[FReethesheeples]

Khan Noonian's post @ # 91: INtersting. I don't understand all the potential or hypothetical implications, but Khan appears to have given this considerable thought. Heads' up.

Freegards, (& Thank to Khan),

[Gene Vidocq]

"The dud anthrax attack on or close to 24 February 2003."

Fort McPherson?