Skip to comments.
Bubble Fusion takes next hurdle
Heise onlin ^
| 18.07.2005
| Haiko LIetz
Posted on 07/19/2005 7:34:14 PM PDT by Arkie2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
07/19/2005 7:34:15 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
To: Arkie2
"We found out that when comet-like streamers of bubbles formed the reactions would stop. Their irregular shape diminishes the bubbles' ability to compress the enclosed gas and subsequently prevents fusion reactions from occurring." I hate it when that happens!
2
posted on
07/19/2005 7:40:04 PM PDT
by
The Duke
To: Arkie2
3
posted on
07/19/2005 7:40:13 PM PDT
by
flashbunny
(Always remember to bring a towel!)
To: The Duke
Happens in champagne all the time.
4
posted on
07/19/2005 7:41:59 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: Arkie2
Huh huh... Butt.
To: The Duke
I'm studying Real Estate Bubble Fusion.
6
posted on
07/19/2005 7:42:45 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(We few. We silly few.)
To: Arkie2
Ho-hum. I used to create Bubble Fusion when my mom gave me a bath.
7
posted on
07/19/2005 7:42:46 PM PDT
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: Arkie2
Fascinating - always thought that there was substance tothe first reports of coldfusion.
The big question is can it be commercialized
8
posted on
07/19/2005 7:43:01 PM PDT
by
spanalot
To: Arkie2
Can they scale it up to power a home?
To: Arkie2
Replication, an important step towards mainstream acceptance. I wonder if it's easily scalable and/or can be used for space propulsion?
10
posted on
07/19/2005 7:45:21 PM PDT
by
Brett66
(Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Brett66
Since hot fusion has always been 20 years out for the last 60 years I'm guessing it will take at least 20 years to bring this to fruition. ;^)
11
posted on
07/19/2005 7:47:23 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: Arkie2
The Physicists I know have widely panned this entire branch of research as a waste of resources. I find it extremely difficult to accept that meaningful fusion on an scale useful as a energy source can be achieved with this approach, much less that fusion is even occurring at all.
To: HangnJudge
The Wright brothers were widely panned by experts in the field of manned flight. You should withhold judgement for a few more years at least until this plays out.
The article includes doubts from Seth Putterman who has said Taleyarkin's early experiments were flawed and has doubts about this experiment but even he says he expects eventual results from bubble fusion.
13
posted on
07/19/2005 7:54:02 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: Arkie2
We'll see, but my paltry 5 years of Nuclear Engineering training
is severely balking at the physics and the engineering.
To: HangnJudge
What's the old saying? There's always something new under the sun? Appropriate in this case.
Even if sonoluminescence isn't fusion it's still a very interesting phnomenon worthy of research.
15
posted on
07/19/2005 8:02:23 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: Arkie2
Now that is just perfect! A couple of Boilermakers inventing Bubble Fusion. Kinda like back to the future.
To: Arkie2
Chinese to Butt: "Ah, so!"
17
posted on
07/19/2005 8:08:52 PM PDT
by
ReadyNow
To: Arkie2
Famouse Swedish-American Polka/Jazz Bubble Fusion empressario Lawrence Welk.
Nobody did bubbles like Lawrence Welk.
18
posted on
07/19/2005 8:09:09 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Howard Dean's Democratic Party: Traitors, Haters, and Vacillators)
To: HangnJudge
"The Physicists I know have widely panned this entire branch of research as a waste of resources. I find it extremely difficult to accept that meaningful fusion on an scale useful as a energy source can be achieved with this approach, much less that fusion is even occurring at all."Nuclear fission gives off a very similar signature (e.g. a 2.5MeV neutron even) to what has been recorded in these experiments...and nuclear fission occurs *naturally*...so it's hardly surprising that it is being observed in a lab experiment.
They claim that they are observing fusion, and they *may* be right (certainly that's the path to grant money), but I'm skeptical. They may just be observing fission.
As for scaling this sort of thing up, there are hurdles. Bubbles can only exist so close to each other. If the density of fission events isn't high enough, then no amount of scaling will ever produce more energy than it consumes (e.g. a self-sustaining chain reaction).
As in the above experiment, they will have to keep injecting energy (e.g. ultrasound) to keep stimulating a few fission/fussion events.
19
posted on
07/19/2005 8:15:22 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Arkie2
All I need is some empty beer cans and a few banana peels.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson