Skip to comments.
Poll: Hillary Can't Be Commander in Chief
NewsMax ^
| 7/19/05
| NewsMax
Posted on 07/19/2005 5:23:12 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
This is rather shocking considering it's USA Today.
1
posted on
07/19/2005 5:23:15 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
America is not yet ready for a dyke Commander-in-Chief, we haven't even had a woman president.
To: wagglebee
recently introduced legislation to boost the Army by 80,000 soldiers over the next four years.
LOL - I thought the only way you could increase force sizes was through conscription! Shazam!
3
posted on
07/19/2005 5:30:41 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: wagglebee
"Only half said she is a strong and decisive leader"
Huh? Like in 50%? That's too damn good for the witch....this is scary! All she has to do is campaign on her strong points where the folk rate her in high numbers!
To: citizencon
Technically, she would be Commander in Panties.
5
posted on
07/19/2005 5:33:12 PM PDT
by
Edit35
To: wagglebee; citizencon; Mia T
She also was never supposed to be able to become a U.S. senator from New York. And she covets the Oval Office exponentially more.
Underestimate HRC at your own peril.
6
posted on
07/19/2005 5:33:12 PM PDT
by
jla
To: andyk
I think this is the poll that Hotline (a National Journal subsidiary) ran that showed Condi smacking down Hillary on National Security issues going away. It was a slaughter. That part of the poll was
not in USAToday.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
7
posted on
07/19/2005 5:34:27 PM PDT
by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
To: jla
The day Rudy Guiliani dropped out of the NY senate race, Hitlery was basically guaranteed the spot.
8
posted on
07/19/2005 5:34:36 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Hillary Clinton's "toughness" has never been an issue. She's as tough as nails. It's the quality of her character or lack thereof and political agenda that make her unqualified for any position of authority.
9
posted on
07/19/2005 5:35:16 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: citizencon
we haven't even had a woman president
If we needed the 19th amendment for women to vote, I'm not sure one could be President, constitutionally, without another amendment. I realize that goes against the conventional wisdom.
10
posted on
07/19/2005 5:36:21 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: wagglebee
Good, case closed. Let's move on!
11
posted on
07/19/2005 5:36:35 PM PDT
by
kempster
To: wagglebee
"That's the nagging underpinning that nobody likes to talk about, the 800-pound gorilla on her back."
How does one differentiate between Hitlery and a Gorilla?
12
posted on
07/19/2005 5:37:18 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: wagglebee
The democrats wont nominate Hillary, there is no way she could win, heck they will probably go with Kerry/Edwards again.
To: jla
She has a huge money machine behind her, one which controls a great portion of the MSM ~ she will stop at nothing to gain the White House, while Slick quietly moves into position to take over the UN. Make no mistake about it, this pair has world domination as their ultimate goal and we all stand to lose if we allow it happen!
14
posted on
07/19/2005 5:40:22 PM PDT
by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: wagglebee
Condi Rice, great though she is, would have the same problem.
15
posted on
07/19/2005 5:40:26 PM PDT
by
tkathy
(Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
To: wagglebee
I have no doubt that this lamp throwing bitch is tough enough; my concern is that she lacks the temperament to exert self-control. There's no way Hillary would keep her head in a crisis.
Besides, she wouldn't have Jake Reno to cover her massive keister.
16
posted on
07/19/2005 5:40:33 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
To: jla
she covets the Oval Office exponentially more. Reason enough she should not get the office.
17
posted on
07/19/2005 5:42:59 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: wagglebee
Guess she isn't going to unite the country...
18
posted on
07/19/2005 5:44:27 PM PDT
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: citizencon
Actually, hillary in "old crusty" configuration [aka "enhanced yield dirty bomb"] has tremendous military - nay, strategeric military- value and should be dropped on Mecca at first opportunity. I hope it would be within B-52 lift weight.
19
posted on
07/19/2005 5:44:58 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Carry_Okie
I think her cover was more likely named Gorelick. Reno was Gorelick's cover.
20
posted on
07/19/2005 5:51:41 PM PDT
by
BARLF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson