Tancredo's "off-cuff" talk off the wall

Denver Post ^ | 07/19/2005 | Diane Carman

[Paleo Conservative]

Congressman Tancredo has the right enemies.

[Stew Padasso]

"very serious and can cause significant hazards to all Americans,"

Oh, piss off.

[bayourod]

What Tancredo did is make the most irresponsible statement I've ever heard a Congressman make during the time of war.

He is doing more to assist the Muslim terrorists in recruiting suicide bombers than all the Mullahs combined could do on their own.

President Bush, the Cabinet, all officials and all American Congressmen, both Republican and Democrat have been very specific and vocal that we are not at war with Islam, but rather only the minority terrorists that threaten us and the regimes that sponsor them.

Now a loosed lip wacko scam artist announces to them that we are really at war against the Muslim religion by threatening to bomb their holy sites.

Tancredo has the blood of American soldiers on his hands, and anyone who posts similar statements on the Internet that can be shown to Muslim school children shares his guilt.

[South40]

Tancredo ROCKS!

[Bigg Red]

...Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington, who was livid about the congressman's remarks.

**
Anything Tancredo or anyone says that makes that blowhard America hater livid is fine with me.

[cripplecreek]

These people are full of false outrage over Tancredos remarks. The real issue is border control. Liberal style smear tactics at thier worst.

[lawdog]

You don't get it do you? Give this one a rest.

Thanks.

[ken21]

two words you won't see together again:




tancredo


presidential

[Mr. Mojo]

Congressman Tancredo has the right enemies.

Yep. ...Ibrahim Hooper and Cultural Jihad.

[flashbunny]

CJ can't give anything a rest.

[Stew Padasso]

So, what should be our response if we are hit with a WMD in the US? And we can prove that fanatic Muslims planned, financed and carried it out?

Conduct a police investigation?

[Cultural Jihad]

Mullah Tancredo supporting our troops

[andyk]

"I think an apology is due to all Muslims in America and around the world, and particularly to the Muslims he represents," he said.

No apology is due. Tancredo's the man. I think nuking Mecca in response to a terrorist attack with nuclear weapons is perfectly appropriate. Notice that the author said Tancredo supports nuking muslim holy sites if "if terrorists attempted a nuclear attack".

[Czar]

He sure does. Including the person responsible for posting this piece of left wing dreck. I see his fellow travelers are already swarming to this thread. Mere mention of "Tancredo" draws them like bees to honey. Pure instinct only--no reasoning.

[coloradan]

Diane Carman

(Liberal MSM Idiot)

[Hot Tabasco]

He is doing more to assist the Muslim terrorists in recruiting suicide bombers than all the Mullahs combined could do on their own.

What a screwball statement!

Yea, yea, you nuke one of our cities and we should really, really talk about this! Just what I want to hear.....

[jwh_Denver]

"scam artist"

I don't think he's trying to scam anybody. He means it. And it's about time an American official said it.

[A Jovial Cad]

Yep. ...Ibrahim Hooper and Cultural Jihad

LOL! And oh so true.

[coloradan]

Suppose a nuke attack is attempted or completed, on US soil, in the future.

Should we (a) talk about what we might do in response beforehand, now, in a calm and rational way, or (b) keep our heads in the sand until said supposed attack happens, and only then, in the heat of the moment, decide what we're going to do about it?