To: Dr.Zoidberg
>> Still waiting Bubba....
Your feeble attempts at mis-direction are noted, punk.
Not one of you has proven that Roberts is a conservative. My concern is this: anyone who received a unanimous voice vote in 2003 (READ THAT DATE: 2003!!) for appointment to the D.C. Court (a court the liberals covet) is highly suspect. I will reserve my glee until he makes a few votes on the S.C.
1,648 posted on
07/19/2005 7:49:32 PM PDT by
PhilipFreneau
("The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork." -- Psalms 19:1)
To: PhilipFreneau
You know what? Go look it up yourself. I answered you with both his opinion on Roe V Wade and endorsements from Ed Meese and Ken Starr. Someone else has mentioned HHugh Hewitt and Mark Levin think this is a great choice.
It also was explained why they do voice votes, which is how he got confirmed unanimously.
You don't like the answers because you don't want to admit that the guy is a conservative and you were wrong about President Bush.
So, go pound sand.
1,661 posted on
07/19/2005 7:54:13 PM PDT by
Miss Marple
(Karl Rove is Plame-proof.)
To: PhilipFreneau
Punk? Me? Pot meet kettle.
I'll note your reply as unresponsive.
Still waiting for you to prove Judge Roberts is anything but a conservative. If all you have for rebuttal is the same numbers (minus 1) in confirmation that the horrible liberal devil Scalia received.
If you haven't got anything better than that boy, you might want to keep your mouth shut. You're beginning to sound like a drunken Teddy Kennedy tonight.
1,681 posted on
07/19/2005 8:02:19 PM PDT by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Join islam, see the world. Blow up unrepentant infidels. Uncle Bin Laden wants you.)
To: PhilipFreneau
Not one of you has proven that Roberts is a conservative. He's argued 24 cases before the SC. Look them up. See what he has said.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson