Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky
Oh Barbra Streisand!

The president was NEVER going to nominate Gonzales and only the politically naive and forever UNAPPEASEABLE thought he would. And Clement was a red herring.

You and the rest of the UNAPPEASEABLE purists are NEVER going to get it.

Oh and BTW...YOU had less than NOTHING whatsoever to do with the president's SCOTUS choice.

Reagan chose O'Connor; remember ?

Now, tell me again, just how "principled" Conservatives got President Bush to pick Roberts? ROTFLMSO

850 posted on 07/19/2005 7:06:21 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
Really? He didn't nominate Alberto to the Texas Supreme Court? A highway in Texas wasn't named after abortionist John B. Coleman with Bush's authorization?

It's absolutely moronic to place one's trust in a politician rather than fighting for what one believes in.

922 posted on 07/19/2005 8:34:28 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons
Oh, BTW, will be appeased so long as the nominees keep being originalist. THEN AND ONLY THEN WILL BE APPEASED.

But, we might be more appeased, if Bush and the Republicans actually did something to secure the borders and stopped spending money at a faster rate than any administration since the Johnson administration. And, we might be more appeased if we don't see any more incremental versions of the Hillary's health care plan like the Medicare prescription drug plan.

928 posted on 07/19/2005 8:37:39 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson