Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CollegeRepublicanNU
At best Condi would qualify for Veep. Most people want some sort of governing leadership from their President, which is why Govenors, former Veeps, and retired Generals are so often elected President.

As much of a RINO he may be, Powell would be better qualified to be Pres, with Condi as his Veep. Now THAT would be an NCAA proof ticket, with Condi running for President in 2016.

16 posted on 07/19/2005 9:47:23 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo
LOL! More coffee, STAT! Two errors:

"...some sort of governing leadership" experience "from their..."

and

NCAA NAACP

20 posted on 07/19/2005 9:50:01 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

I think presiding over the State Department, at this time in our history, provides greater qualification than Governor and certainly Senator. Four out of George Washington's five successors were Secretary of States (although Jefferson was also a Governor), but those guys did ok as President.

A Condi campaign's strength could also be it's weakness. Since she has no real campaigning experience, she could be a breath of fresh air on the campaign, or an uncharismatic disaster. But if she succeeds in the former, it would gut the entire Clinton playbook, considering that if there would be any campaign in history that will master the "by-the-book" political stragems it would be the 08 Clinton machine. Hillary is very methodical and unspontaneous, so they will have their attacks and speeches well schemed in advance, like a champion chess player.

They will have spent more money in their campaign--Hollywood, big media, along w/ normal hard and soft money--than any campaign in history. It will be organized, centered around Hillay's domineering persona. That money and coordination will buy them alot in political tactics and strategic overthink. Frankly, the GOP won't be able to compete against that in a normal campaign. A traditional Republican politician, a George Allen or Jeb Bush, who would respond to the Clintonian attacks in a traditional by-the-book manner, might play right into the buzzsaw of the Clintons' machines moves. A nontraditional Republican politician, an Eisenhower like character (a Condi Rice or a Tommy Franks), might just float above the game and leave the Clintons' schemes. The Clintons would need someone to come to the chess table in order to win in 08. The Republicans need someone who can avoid the "game" but still go straight to the people.


34 posted on 07/19/2005 10:12:48 AM PDT by 0siris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson