And, Clement has virtually no record of ruling on key issues. That's the problem.
We know where Edith Hollan Jones stands, though.
Untrue.
We have indications of voting patterns on some key issues. The area that is vague that I know you are refering to is R V W.
And, again, it isn't R v W I have a specific interest in at the moment. That is a distracting point. I wish to know how she feels about established precedent as a member of the Supreme Court. If we can deduce her position on that, we'll know her opinion on individual cases such as R V W.
And, yes, we know based on Judicial record to date where Edith Jones stands at this time. That isn't a point of discussion.