This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 07/19/2005 5:18:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
new thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1446387/posts |
Posted on 07/19/2005 9:23:04 AM PDT by Howlin
Edited on 07/19/2005 5:12:12 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
More info..CNN justa lso rfeported that Michael Luttig's entire family..wife and kids..was inn his courtroom today..he is hearing a big anti-terrorism case..all were nicely dressed...wife would NOT answer producer's question if they were going to DC after court is over..
I think he means nominate Jones and if the a-rats don't like it, go nukular.
Ah Man!
Do you mean Priscilla Owen?
Hi Ken :-)
Heck - I'll toast you! ;-P
I agree with you about abortion being murder. But you guys have to get a grip! You don't have enemies here, quit acting like you do.
but yeah, I think we have to sit and wait. I won't be calling at this late hour, but in case somebody else felt like it, I thought I would post the number (it isn't some secret one....results.gov has an appointee directory in which it lists info about different appointments and their office numbers).
Cautious optimism seems to be the general mood around here as people discover more about Clement.
Maybe it represents what the dims said they were gonna do...go nuclear!!!! if they didn't like Bushs' nominee.
WOT and Judges were responsible for the election of the President and the Republican Majority.
Two groups made that majority possible. Whether the people that stayed home in 2000 made the difference, or whether it was new influx of voterss motivated by these two issues, isn't a point that ultimately matters. What I know is that both were motivating issues that made the difference.
It resulted in an election that could have been another 2000, instead being settled the day after. That cushion of voters prevented another nightmare of drawn out court battles.
If it's an archconservative woman she won't REALLY be a woman.
Well good! I just think that getting hysterical before the pick is counter-productive, I trust President Bush. It will be OK.
I'd have stayed at the pool, Ma'am....
So he hasn't let you down in his massive growth of the government? So massive and fast has the growth been that he exceeds all previous Presidents except one. LBJ.
Bush has disappointed me and let me down on many matters.
Hiya back at ya..
Goler(sp) on Fox said the reports that it's Clemont are premature.....that Bush keeps these things close to the vest.....he did make me spit up a little when he compared Clemont to O'Conner. yuck
So we wait.
Exactly.
I am not worried. He has done some things I disagree with in non-judicial areas, but his judicial picks are solid.
Why would he screw up in the most important one?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.