Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stockstrader
Where do you get the information that she is Pro-Choice? The post quotes the comment on "settled law", which is the same answer all nominees to the court of appeals give (including Bill Pryor) because it is settled until the Supreme Court states otherwise.

There is nothing to suggest that she thinks Roe is constitutional or would uphold it as a Supreme Court Justice.

89 posted on 07/19/2005 8:44:05 AM PDT by CWW (Mark Sanford for President on 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: CWW

I agree with you. This notion that she is somehow Pro-Choice borders on the absurd. Both Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia gave answers much in the same way.

At this point, folks here need to calm down, get the facts, and properly put her comments in context with the manner in which she has decided cases. From all accounts, she is a strict constructionist (i.e. the Scalia/Thomas method for deciding cases).


94 posted on 07/19/2005 8:50:13 AM PDT by rog4vmi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: CWW

Please read today's www.newsmax.com. The article referenced at the top makes her position very clear.


110 posted on 07/19/2005 9:15:35 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson