There is nothing to suggest that she thinks Roe is constitutional or would uphold it as a Supreme Court Justice.
I agree with you. This notion that she is somehow Pro-Choice borders on the absurd. Both Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia gave answers much in the same way.
At this point, folks here need to calm down, get the facts, and properly put her comments in context with the manner in which she has decided cases. From all accounts, she is a strict constructionist (i.e. the Scalia/Thomas method for deciding cases).
Please read today's www.newsmax.com. The article referenced at the top makes her position very clear.