Fine statement of the issue. To which I would add this question ...
Does she view Roe as bad precedent?
When they say she is seen as a conservative strict constructionist and then say she supports Roe, we have the media saying absolutely contradictory things.
If she is nominated, she will have a long record and that will be viewed in detail. I would not read much into anything she says in the hearings as no judge worth a damn will comment in a manner that details specific views.
I suspect she is a real strict constructionist and will move judiciously to reign in Roe, as well as other excesses.
One thing that does seem to be clear. She is FAR more of a Constitutionalist that O'Conner.