Concise but incomplete. Wilson's motives and the results of his lies are never addressed. Wilson, a former State Dept. official and adviser to John Kerry, and his wife, a CIA employee, actually concocted this lie in an attempt to smear a sitting President during wartime. They are operatives for the democrats who used the dem controlled media to subvert the national security objectives of this administration. Traitors, the lot of 'em.
Does anyone have the definitive date Wilson signed on as an advisor to the Kerry campaign?
A previous posting said he signed on with Kerry prior to July 2003 when Wilson (who in effect was a temporary contract employee of the CIA) wrote the NYTimes article criticizing the Bush Administration's Iraq policy.
Thirdly: Isn't there some type of rule saying employees of the CIA (past or present) cannot use or reveal any information about their service WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE CIA.
Mark Levins article of a few days ago, really makes you wonder why 'she'(Mrs. Plame Wilson) would insert herself into this? If she was so 'covert', you'd think she would keep out of the public eye. Wilson thought he could hid behind her?
Does the Media even admit she was behind Wilsons trip?
I agree. You make a good point regarding Wilson's part in this controversy. But, I believe that the WT editorial closes the book quite effectively on the Rove matter in way that everyone can understand... even the nitwits commenting on my blog that desperately want to keep focus on Rove. It is clear why they need to keep the focus on Rove. But, the limb they are on with Wilson is long, quite thin, has no leaves, and extends over a cliff.