Well, the "search and seizure" clause of the Constitution is in a sense a right to privacy, so her finding a right to privacy does not bother me too much.
The remarks about the right to abortion being settled law do not by any means give me the warm and fuzzies.
However, being the eternal optimist, I think I sense in her tone and wording a hint that she does not agree with the Supreme Court on this.
You must examine the "penumbra" of her statement. :-)
I agree, sort of "He who agrees against his will/Is of the same opinion still" tone (though to say it would have sunk her like a rock in those hearings).