To: Paleo Conservative
2 posted on
07/18/2005 7:32:28 PM PDT by
Wiz
To: Righty_McRight
It's a shame they did away with the 757 and decided to stretch the 737.
To: Righty_McRight
Why don't they just revive and juice-up the 757?
4 posted on
07/18/2005 7:34:33 PM PDT by
stboz
To: Righty_McRight
but, with the addition of a pair of exit doors and a flat rear pressure bulkhead, will carry 26 additional passengers, and smaller seats....ba$tards.
5 posted on
07/18/2005 7:34:36 PM PDT by
evolved_rage
(Its Bush's fault.)
To: Righty_McRight
Took them long enough. The 737-900ER (-900X) has been something a lot of the European charter airlines have been wanting for some time now.
6 posted on
07/18/2005 7:34:39 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Tom Tancredo- The Republican Party's Very Own Cynthia McKinney.)
To: Righty_McRight; COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; ...
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail not by posting to this thread.
14 posted on
07/18/2005 11:24:19 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Righty_McRight
Lion needs them, they fly some really crappy MD80's.
15 posted on
07/18/2005 11:24:52 PM PDT by
Central Scrutiniser
(I've always had the 'gift' to see the truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
