Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California resumes medical marijuana program
AP ^ | 7/18/05 | AP - Sacramento

Posted on 07/18/2005 6:58:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

SACRAMENTO (AP) - State officials revived California's medical marijuana identification card program Monday, saying state employees weren't violating federal law by issuing pot ID cards.

"The state attorney general has reviewed this concern and said that California can issue ID cards to medical marijuana users without state employees facing prosecution for assisting in the commission of a federal crime," state Health Director Sandra Shewry said in a statement.

Shewry's office shuttered the pilot program 10 days ago, citing concerns over a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

Last month, the court ruled that people who smoke marijuana because their doctors recommend it to ease pain or other conditions can be prosecuted for violating federal drug laws.

The ruling did not strike down laws in California and nine other states that permit medical cannabis use, but said federal drug laws take precedence.

In a legal review sought by Shewry, Attorney General Bill Lockyer said that employees issuing the IDs could not be prosecuted for aiding or abetting the violation of a crime.

Lockyer's office also said that the information collected from applicants could be obtained by federal authorities and used to identify and prosecute medical marijuana users.

Health department spokesman Ken August said he was not aware of federal agents requesting such information.

Shewry said a new program application would state clearly that information submitted could be turned over to federal authorities and that possession of marijuana remains a federal crime.

The 123 people who already have been issued the IDs will be also be contacted, August said.

Complying with a state mandate that lawmakers passed after California voters approved a medical marijuana law in 1996, the state Health Department in May launched the pilot pot card program in Amador, Del Norte and Mendocino counties.

One purpose of the cards is to give medical pot users a way to show they have a legitimate reason for possessing pot if they are stopped by law enforcement.

The pilot program will is scheduled to be complete by the end of the month and expand statewide on Aug. 1.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: addictedlosers; bitterwodiealert; bongbrigade; california; drugskilledbelushi; marijuana; medical; mrleroytokes; program; resumes; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Ya got yur REd, Blue, and GReen states.

California, once again, a GReen state.

1 posted on 07/18/2005 6:58:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Uh hmm. If a few of them get arrested and convicted in Federal Court, they might see things differently


2 posted on 07/18/2005 7:20:29 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

A word of advice to tokers - do not draw the 'going up the river' card.


3 posted on 07/18/2005 7:21:59 PM PDT by headsonpikes ("The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

Re: "A word of advice to tokers "-(snip)

The issue of marijuana use being allowed at the state level is completely legitimate and can be defended from the 10th amendment provisions.


4 posted on 07/18/2005 7:45:00 PM PDT by winston2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Uh hmm. If a few of them get arrested and convicted in Federal Court, they might see things differently

I'm with California on this one. Let's see the federosaurus try to wriggle out of the public relations nightmare it would create dragging the first batch of cancer patients off to prison. This would be one opportunity for Hollywood to actually do some good.

5 posted on 07/18/2005 8:09:01 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
Oh, they would go right after the Doctors, and I doubt they care one whit about PR.
That will all even out in the wash.
You will be anti, I will be pro.

They have done this exact thing right here in Florida, albeit the drug was not weed, but still was a valid prescription substance.
They are serving long sentences, and the precedent is set, although it is only on point.
6 posted on 07/18/2005 8:15:59 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"The ruling did not strike down laws in California and nine other states that permit medical cannabis use,"

Time to put an end to this bull$hit -- these flagrant violations of the Supremacy Clause have gone on long enough.

Activate the California National Guard and arrest those public officials who violated their oath of office to honor and defend the U.S. Constitution and charge them with sedition, if not treason.

The other nine states will get the message.

7 posted on 07/18/2005 8:21:31 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Arizona issues marijuana tax stamps. I think that was due to one of the legalization votes a few years back. It's still not legal to smoke dope though.


8 posted on 07/18/2005 9:48:59 PM PDT by Tarantulas (http://borderpundit.tarantulas.net - the BorderPundit blog - a Border Issues weblog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Pots illegal in CA?
9 posted on 07/18/2005 10:04:20 PM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Time to put an end to this bull$hit -- these flagrant violations of the Supremacy Clause have gone on long enough.

Activate the California National Guard and arrest those public officials who violated their oath of office to honor and defend the U.S. Constitution and charge them with sedition, if not treason.

The other nine states will get the message.




I tip my hat to the most strident supporter of American Totalitarianism on this site! You are the Thug of All Thugs, rp.


10 posted on 07/19/2005 6:07:43 AM PDT by headsonpikes ("The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
The other nine states will get the message.

...with the exception of Arizona. We're armed.

11 posted on 07/19/2005 6:28:13 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Ah, I see. It's OK to violate your Oath of Office and the U.S. Constitution if you simply disagree with the federal law.

Didn't work for Governor George Wallace, did it? AND, he had the full support of the citizens of Alabama who disagreed with that federal law.

STATE's RIGHTS! (sometimes)

headsonpikes, our resident "Anarchist Extraordinaire".

12 posted on 07/19/2005 6:37:22 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
"...with the exception of Arizona. We're armed."

That's the attitude we're looking for! We can violate the U.S. Constitution because we're armed

Should be the Arizona State Motto -- it would look good on a license plate.

13 posted on 07/19/2005 6:45:05 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
It is scarcely anarchy to favor limited government.

Your persistant enthusiasm for national uniformity, and your slobbering regard for what amounts to mere lawyering, as opposed to justice, betrays your real politics - the centrality and sovereignty of the state over human social life.

The greatest threat to American freedom is not alien Marxist Communism and Islamo-Fascism, but home-grown 'progressive and community-minded' folks who are absolutely certain they know how all Americans should live, and are willing to contort the plain language of the Constitution to have their way.

14 posted on 07/19/2005 8:21:22 AM PDT by headsonpikes ("The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

Our founding fathers had a paranoia about overly powerful federal government and voile- I think I'll smoke some of my medicine and meditate about this.
Peace


15 posted on 07/19/2005 3:17:48 PM PDT by winston2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: winston2
The issue of marijuana use being allowed at the state level is completely legitimate and can be defended from the 10th amendment provisions.

No, it can't. Anybody making that argument in Federal Court is gonna get slapped upside the head with a fistful of Gonzales v. Raich.

16 posted on 07/20/2005 4:24:09 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; headsonpikes
Activate the California National Guard and arrest those public officials who violated their oath of office to honor and defend the U.S. Constitution and charge them with sedition, if not treason.

Nice rant. Might carry a bit more weight if the Supreme Court had struck down California's Medical Marijuana law as unconstitutional, but it did not. The Court let the law stand, only ruling that it was not a protection from Federal prosecution.

17 posted on 07/21/2005 3:31:31 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes; robertpaulsen
I tip my hat to the most strident supporter of American Totalitarianism on this site!

Careful, bobbyp'll tell you the fed can do what it wants because the Constitution bears no stated right to consume pot. You know he's got little time for the 9th Amendment and limited government.

The Constitution contains no stated right to bear children either but I'd bet ol' bobbo would crap bricks if the feds decided we need permission to procreate. I could be wrong though. He's pretty firm on limited rights and unlimited gov't.

18 posted on 07/21/2005 3:57:11 AM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Thank you. Had to get it off my chest.

Are you aware of any other situation where an activity is legal by state law but illegal at the federal level? I don't understand why/how the USSC can let this stand.

19 posted on 07/21/2005 6:04:57 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

It is indeed a strange situation.


20 posted on 07/21/2005 6:06:19 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson