Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
It's not a treaty (that wouldn't pass); it's a trade agreement (that maybe they can sneak by).

Interesting, now that you mentioned it, I looked up the vote and saw that it was only 54-45. Maybe there still is hope. In any case, though it still required at least a majority of the Senate to approve. 2/3 of them aren't going to turn around and impeach him for it.

Why NAFTA wasn't taken to court over this bogus distinction I'll never know.

I don't know what difference it would make. The government will just say that it's not a treaty; it's an act of Congress. It's not like the courts have recognized any meaningful limitations on those.

27 posted on 07/18/2005 2:21:18 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
The government will just say that it's not a treaty; it's an act of Congress.

The government would be lying. When a nation "agrees" with any other nation, the laws of nations are very clear that such an instrument is a treaty. Further, the Congress and the Administrative branch often lack the Constitutional authority to execute the terms of extranational rulings.

Yeah, I know, that doesn't stop them.

31 posted on 07/18/2005 2:29:49 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson