Skip to comments.
Left's list for high court seen as setup
The Washington Times ^
| 7-18-05
| Charles Hurt
Posted on 07/18/2005 11:47:23 AM PDT by JZelle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
These people just never stop!!
1
posted on
07/18/2005 11:47:24 AM PDT
by
JZelle
To: JZelle
I'm shaking in my boots.
And I'm not even wearing boots.
2
posted on
07/18/2005 11:49:37 AM PDT
by
VoiceOfBruck
(He asked him knowingly)
To: JZelle
How many Evangelicals or practicing Catholics are in Bush's final four?
That is the metric.
3
posted on
07/18/2005 11:53:37 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
(Protectionism is Patriotism in both war and trade.)
To: JZelle
Let's get together and send our 'acceptable' names for the 2008 Democratic nomination for President.
4
posted on
07/18/2005 11:54:49 AM PDT
by
WOSG
To: ex-snook
Um, 'final 4' doesn't matter.
He nominates one.
5
posted on
07/18/2005 11:55:23 AM PDT
by
WOSG
To: JZelle
Ward Churchill
Michael Moore
George Soros
Al Franken
A democrat acceptable short list direct off the democratic short bus.
6
posted on
07/18/2005 11:55:59 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: JZelle
I still want to see the list of people that the Democrats consider "unacceptable."
7
posted on
07/18/2005 11:57:08 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism cannot survive in a free and open society.)
To: JZelle
Pretty silly. They will push and bluff until they realize the consequences -- no more filibusters and Bush can get whomever he wants confirmed.
They don't want it to come to this. I suspect that they will pull back at some point.
8
posted on
07/18/2005 11:58:05 AM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: cripplecreek
Sorry not liberal enough.
9
posted on
07/18/2005 11:59:11 AM PDT
by
handy old one
(It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
To: JZelle
I have decided the Democratic Party needs to officially change its name to the Indignation Party. That is all they do, call the news cameras around and throw Indignation Parties.
10
posted on
07/18/2005 11:59:48 AM PDT
by
msnimje
To: WOSG
I have 'thought on it', and I simply can't think of an 'acceptable' name for the 2008 democRAT nomination for 'president'
11
posted on
07/18/2005 12:03:52 PM PDT
by
skyhawk9211
(skyhawk921 ( Semper FI - Marine Air))
To: handy old one
I was picking "moderate" democrats.
12
posted on
07/18/2005 12:05:32 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: WOSG
"Um, 'final 4' doesn't matter.""He nominates one."
You're right. But if they are not well represented in the 'final four' their name won't even get in the hat!
13
posted on
07/18/2005 12:06:01 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
(Protectionism is Patriotism in both war and trade.)
To: JZelle
My own prediction is that the Dem's have NO intention to vote on a SCOTUS nominee. They will continue to ask for more & more info until October comes and goes.
Once a nominee is selected... the DNC/MSM will begin the drumbeat. 24/7 propaganda that the guy/gal is toooo conservative... toooo much of an activist. If they can manipulate the polls to their favor... they might force an impasse.
14
posted on
07/18/2005 12:06:25 PM PDT
by
johnny7
(“'I bet 'ya think I'm 'kickin you Bob...!”” -Sheriff 'Little Bill' Dagget)
To: JZelle
Dems expect Republicans to act as though they've lost the election, which is expected.
Problem is, the GOP seems to agree with them.
Party discipline does not exist in the GOP, with idiots like Specter, McCain and Graham running around.
15
posted on
07/18/2005 12:08:06 PM PDT
by
Dolphan
(God Bless our Military and their families)
To: dhs12345
Strangely enough, this reminds me of times when I was a kid. I'd do something wrong, get punished, and I'd cry. Then my mom or dad would say, "Shut up, or I'll really give you something to cry about."
Well, if the Dims push too hard, the pubbies will REALLY give them something to cry about - no more filibusters on judicial nominees. (I only wish it could be for all presidential nominees, but alas.)
16
posted on
07/18/2005 12:10:11 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: Cowboy Bob
I still want to see the list of people that the Democrats consider "unacceptable."Anyone that George Bush or any conservative names, will name or even thinks about naming.
17
posted on
07/18/2005 12:11:46 PM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
To: WOSG
"Let's get together and send our 'acceptable' names for the 2008 Democratic nomination for President."
They would need someone who would reflect the qualities of their party. Here are my top three candidates.
1. Pauly Shore
2. Michael Schiavo
3. Ward Churchill
18
posted on
07/18/2005 12:32:13 PM PDT
by
Mcirrus
(Future Reference)
To: Mcirrus
They would need someone who would reflect the qualities of their party. Here are my top three candidates. 1. Pauly Shore
2. Michael Schiavo
3. Ward Churchill
You forgot:
4. GeorgeMichael
5. Paul Reubens
6. Rob Lowe
7. R. Kelley
8. Mike Tyson
19
posted on
07/18/2005 12:55:33 PM PDT
by
Minn
To: JZelle
When is somebody on the RIGHT going to have the GUTS to stand up and say = YOU LOST - YOU DON'T GET TO SELECT ..??
20
posted on
07/18/2005 12:57:40 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson