Skip to comments.
Spam Slayer: Bringing Spammers to Their Knees
PC World ^
| 7/18/05
| Tom Spring
Posted on 07/18/2005 9:43:33 AM PDT by GPBurdell
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
once installed on your PC, makes it part of a community that works to cripple Web sites run by spammers.Sweet!
Buzz
Buzz Blog
1
posted on
07/18/2005 9:43:33 AM PDT
by
GPBurdell
To: GPBurdell
2
posted on
07/18/2005 9:46:21 AM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: GPBurdell
SpamCop and Spamassassin (linux mailservers) have done this for quite a while now.
3
posted on
07/18/2005 9:47:20 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: GPBurdell
BFLR = Bump for later reading.
4
posted on
07/18/2005 9:48:01 AM PDT
by
Kevin OMalley
(No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
To: RhoTheta
5
posted on
07/18/2005 9:54:37 AM PDT
by
Egon
(By the way, I took the liberty of fertilizing your caviar.)
To: GPBurdell
I won't be happy until spam is traced and returned to the sender, at which point their server/machine melts to goo.
To: GPBurdell
7
posted on
07/18/2005 9:56:48 AM PDT
by
QwertyKPH
(Non-profane tagline)
To: GPBurdell
8
posted on
07/18/2005 9:58:14 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
To: GPBurdell
9
posted on
07/18/2005 9:58:25 AM PDT
by
QwertyKPH
(Non-profane tagline)
To: Dawsonville_Doc
10
posted on
07/18/2005 9:58:29 AM PDT
by
King Prout
(I'd say I missed ya, but that'd be untrue... I NEVER MISS)
To: xcamel

Works great for me!
11
posted on
07/18/2005 9:58:34 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
To: GPBurdell
Does it kill Home Search Assistant?
12
posted on
07/18/2005 9:58:58 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: GPBurdell
first time someone's asked me to voluntarily participate in a reverse DOS attack upon a spammer so nicely...
thanks, but no thanks... I'll pass.
I use NAV (paid for) and the following free software: AdAware, Spybot S&D, Spyblaster & A2-squared. Also run XP2 firewall, plus MS Anti-spyware. All of this running behind aRouter using NAT.
Result is no problems, and minimal use of local resources - typical greenline on HD usage is 15-25%, well within performance bounds.
13
posted on
07/18/2005 9:59:01 AM PDT
by
CGVet58
(God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
To: GPBurdell
Small problem: if you are, say, a hacker for the DNC... can't you come up with fraudulent spam that directs one to, say, the RNC website? And thus get this program to bombard the RNC website into oblivion?
The reverse situation would also apply, and thus competitors could shut down opponents websites through such sleazy means...
14
posted on
07/18/2005 10:00:01 AM PDT
by
orionblamblam
("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
To: GPBurdell
Silly questions:
DOS is illegal in most countries but industrial strength spamming isn't?
What's wrong with this picture?
15
posted on
07/18/2005 10:00:17 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: xcamel
Neither SpamCop nor Spamassassin are mailservers.
SpamCop.net is an organization that maintains an RBL (Realtime Block List) of systems used to send spam, and Spamassassin is software that can, among other things, check to see if a sending mailserver is on that RBL.
16
posted on
07/18/2005 10:01:39 AM PDT
by
cooldog
(Islam is a criminal conspiracy to commit mass murder ... deal with it!)
To: orionblamblam
I know that there are at least a couple of computer/internet savvy folks regularly on Free Republic all the time.
Question:
Is there any software that enables me to allow two-way communications with any given site (once or forever) that, once set, would only allow sites of your choice to upload anything?
17
posted on
07/18/2005 10:04:48 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: GPBurdell
The idea has been floating for a while, but this seems to be the first to do it in a quite damaging distributed manner. I believe the spammers will have the cojones to sue this company when they get hit.
For possible weasel room on the illegality of DDoS, the spammers did trigger the automated DDoS response by their own illegal actions.
To: GPBurdell
Interesting concept ... until the tables get turned and you get charged with a DoS attack. Besides, that is what they say the resident code is doing on your PC that you personally install. How do you know to trust them? It would make more sense that the site would log the multiple violations and then pass the documented proof to Law Enforcement, having group clout to press the claim. This attack-back scheme puts you in the same class as the spammer and changes you from plaintiff to defendant IMHO.
19
posted on
07/18/2005 10:09:21 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("Iraq is the bug light for terrorists" (Mike McConnell 7/2/05))
To: cooldog
**for** mailservers. Please don't be petty. Those who know anything at all about eamil know what I meant.
20
posted on
07/18/2005 10:16:53 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson