Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry; CHARLITE

I read through the link, and it contains a lot of details I hadn't seen gathered well into one place.

It differs some, or perhaps merely shifts the focus a little, but there are a couple of common elements.

The docs came from the Niger embassy. They were created with some egregious errors that anyone could see, specifically, bearing a signature of an official who hadn't been in office for a decade.

Since a Nigerien diplomat would have access to up-to-date signatures, and would certainly know if someone was out of office for 10 years, I would say that the forgeries were designed to be discovered.

That much is clear.


207 posted on 07/23/2005 1:11:29 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: marron

I agree...and there's more. The forgeries were made in the last months of the year 2000 but were not put into circulation for almost a year. Why?


208 posted on 07/23/2005 2:43:59 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson