To: liberallarry
Yeah boy those sitting senators on that "intel" committee, didn't one of those upstanding liberal senators conjure up a MEMO to take down a president. (Rockefeller)
Didn't another worldly sitting senator, more intelligent than the rest, claim that we did not need to remove old Saddam. That one who loves the French and UN more than anything or anyone else in the whole of this planet.
There is another sitting senator who in a previous life was co-president and established "wall-builders" within the DOJ, to prevent homeland security.
Hasn't that old windbag Kennedy been claiming that President Bush made plans in Crawford, Tx. eons ago to remove old Saddam and accuses the President of lying about WMD's, and connected invisible pipelines for Haliburton.
The LIST is very, very, very, long of liberal anti-American first senators, whose sole purpose in this world is to "EQUALIZE ALL NATIONS". I have yet to hear any of these that seek the complete distortion of the Constitution have one negative word about the distortions of Joe Wilson and his attempt to cover up Saddam's trail.
WHY???? They all know darn well what the "INTEL" says.
To: Just mythoughts
I think ultimately Bush is right in his approach to the Muslim and Arab threats. But so what? That doesn't give him the right to overturn our government or deny citizens their right to challange his claims and beliefs.
To: Just mythoughts
WHY???? They all know darn well what the "INTEL" says. Yes they do...and it doesn't say what Bush claims it says.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson