Did Christ preach that being a woman was a sin?
Your comment made no sense at all?
It made no sense, because it took NMH's comment at face value. That was the point...
First, you quoted the other poster when he said: "Think Christ would employ a non repentant homosexual as one of His disciples? I doubt it.
With me so far?
And then you replied with this:
"Christ didn't employ women as disciples either...and your point is?"
And that is when I asked if you equated a woman with someone indulging in homosexual activity? You implied that the reason that Christ had neither as disciples was the same -- like women were sinners by virtue of being women. A woman cannot repent for being a woman and change (even with surgery, she is still a woman). Christ had other reasons for not including women, but it had nothing to do with sin.
A homosexual can leave that lifestyle, repent and be forgiven for his past and Christ could have selected (not employed) him as a disciple.
Do you understand that although Christ walked among sinners, he did not have them (including unrepentant homosexuals) as his disciples? Your comparison was a non sequitor. That was my point.