"Good point, that! Insofar as he knew that being loyal to a colleague would no doubt start this very type of firestorm...Valorous behaviour like this is when one takes actions that one knows will be detrimental to their standing in the comunnity, but takes that action anyway... Santorum had to have been aware that some in our 'community' would react adversely, but he chose not to be dishonourable."
Thank you, very well said.
The dishonor--and illogic, and true hypocrisy--from our community has been right here on this thread.
One person in particular has been screaming HYPOCRITE! about Santorum because he has spoken out against gay marriage...BUT REFUSES TO FIRE THIS GAY GUY NOW!
Yeah, I don't get it either. I don't think I recall Santorum saying gay people shouldn't have jobs, should be marginalized, etc.
Another person got hysterical when I wouldn't buy into the "changed homosexual" "movement"--you know, the "scientific proof" that gays can change to straight, if they're really motivated?
It was an interesting thread, till this ignorant minority came around. Anyway, I'll be answering them soon...just when they think it's over. I can't say they'll look like idiots (I mean, that would be redundant), but they ain't gonna like it. Stay tuned.
And thanks again.
OOOH,I backed out, idiots hurt my head. (I have three kids and three dogs and one husband, between the nine of us, someone is always being an idiot around here.)
It was an interesting thread, till this ignorant minority came around. Anyway, I'll be answering them soon...just when they think it's over. I can't say they'll look like idiots (I mean, that would be redundant), but they ain't gonna like it. Stay tuned.
From your post above I got the impression you didn't see my post 457. I think reading about Spitzer and why he changed his mind that gays can go straight is something you should checkout.