Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pa mom
The gay rights agenda, like the pro-choice agenda, are pure expressions of raw political power. Do you really advocate surrendering and leaving the field of political battle to them? That's how I read your posts. If these agenda are not resisted firmly and vigorously on the field of battle, they win by default. Is that really a good idea?

As their primary weapon in this struggle the leftist proponents of gay rights and abortion chant the mantra, "Government should stay out of our private lives!" They use that weapon because many on the right have absolutely no defense against it. Indeed, when they hear it, they draw their own swords in agreement and commence to cut the throats of conservatives near them, just as has been done on this thread.

Here's the rub: liberals will see to it that the direct effects of abortion and the gay rights agenda are not confined to the privacy of the one's home, bedroom, or body. These practices will, indeed they already have, come to profoundly affect the lives of other Americans, especially the traditional American family, in powerfully corrosive and damaging ways. We are ALL paying an obscenely high cost for the consequences of being forced by liberals and laissez-faire conservatives to accept these things. At some point that cost may bankrupt us in ways that our most dedicated external enemies never could.

The sentiment of the argument "keep government out of our private lives" is sound, but in its execution with regard to gay rights and abortion, liberals will continue to redefine American culture and laws in their own image, and we will ALL be forced to conform. Laws will be implemented and aggressively enforced by government to guarantee it.

But to your point that Santorum's aide should not be treated in this disgraceful fashion, I fully agree with you. There is no indication that he believes the gay rights agenda should be foisted on America or that he is using his position to undermine Santorum's mainstream views on the issue. He should be treated with dignity and respect and left alone in peace. The Republican Party is enriched and strengthened by the presence and hard work of such men and women.

To suggest otherwise (that is, that he is actually working to advance the gay rights agenda) you'd have to believe the aide was a very clever deep cover "plant" by gay activists, and that they placed him there for the very purpose of creating a controversy that would create a schism between Santorum and a substantial number of his conservative supporters. I don't subscribe to tinfoil theory, so I tend to believe that aide is a man like any other man who struggles with private choices but has the wisdom, good sense, discretion, and self-control to keep them private. The liberals who are cynically manipulating the situation are the villains here, not Santorum.

556 posted on 07/17/2005 8:07:15 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

I think there is a bit of paranoia there, but this could be a generational issue. I don't agree with the gay political agenda, but I differentiate that from individual gay people. I don't like the NAACP, but I don't hate all blacks.

I was not the one talking about keeping government out of the bedroom, so maybe you meant to post that to someone else.


568 posted on 07/17/2005 10:37:31 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson