Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Strategist Suggests on MSNBC that President May Be Focus of Leak Probe
MSNBC News | 07/16/2005 | MSNBC

Posted on 07/16/2005 7:55:07 AM PDT by RightFighter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-409 next last
To: Final Authority

Like I said, whoever you are, you aren't a Republican OR a conservative if you actually believe what you posted.


361 posted on 07/16/2005 4:37:05 PM PDT by Howlin (Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: hophead
Their first target was KR.

Their first target was Tom Delay. Prior to that it was Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld.

362 posted on 07/16/2005 4:59:15 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Setting the stage?

LOL! My first thought when Fenn said "This may go all the way to the top" was -- Hillary?

363 posted on 07/16/2005 5:14:56 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
You are exactly right. Do a Google Search on Peter Fenn and you will see that he lives in that nebulous world of public relations. He just wants to be a player in this absurd game and to do so he needs to say something totally obnoxious to be noticed. Who is Peter Fenn? Why should we believe him? Oh, wait a minute, Peter Fenn is a very important person (huh?) involved in PUBLIC RELATIONS. Let's listen to him. He might know what he is talking about.
364 posted on 07/16/2005 5:23:36 PM PDT by joem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: arasina
I guess I'd have to say I do believe that. Maybe not Republicans, but definitely those foolish RINOs who are thinking only of 2008 and their candidacy.

I wouldn't be surprised if you had a couple of them vote to convict President Bush and remove him from office, but they'll still be way short of making it actually happen. The absolute worst-case scenario would have the seven moderate RINOs in the filibuster deal voting to convict, plus Voinovich and Hagel and Trent Lott, figuring this would be the ultimate payback for his being deposed in 2002.

That's still only 55 votes, assuming every Dim votes to convict as well. That's 12 votes short of the number needed to remove Bush from office. IOW, it'll never happen. I bet they don't even get a majority.

And that's the "weak" chamber of Congress. In the House, you'd maybe get Chris Shays and that guy Walter Jones to impeach, but a lot of red-state democrats wouldn't go near it with a 39-1/2 foot pole, no matter how much Nancy Pelosi threatens them.

365 posted on 07/16/2005 5:45:21 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377; tobyhill
I think you've got it.

I think you've both got it. Wilson stepped in it big time. Plame is the NYT soure (outing herself!). Corn is busy re-explaining that it wasn't he who outed Plame (following Wilson's confession). Rove's only grievance was in trying to protect his old confidante, Novak. Wilson is a vindictive, partisan, hack, with delusions of being Phillip Agee, and so he should be burned by Fitzgerald.

I agree that GW should not have allowed himself to be cowed into apologizing for the british Niger yellowcake intel, which at the time no-one could prove to be true or false. And which in fact turned out to have been true.

PS: I agree, I'm sure we send only our best and brightest Ambassadors to Gabon, another region totally screwed up by French colonialism.

366 posted on 07/16/2005 6:06:22 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

This is stupidity. I've seen several dem strategists on the talking head shows the last few days, and they are all pathetically desperate and strident. This is no different. I'd be shocked to find out that Dubya knew who Valerie Plame was before Novak wrote his column.


367 posted on 07/16/2005 7:51:54 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("James...Earn this...Earn it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

bump


368 posted on 07/16/2005 8:00:46 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

Payback for Monicagate, Travelgate, Whitewatergate, Paula Jonesgate, Broderickgate, Wileygate, BillingRecordsgate,WebHubbelgate, Fostergate, Browngate, Renogate,
FBIRecordsgate, or Clinton (was a bad boy gate).


369 posted on 07/16/2005 8:05:14 PM PDT by Revererdrv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

Peter Fenn is an idiot. It's interesting, though, that the memo was to the State Dept. Sounds like someone in the State Dept. may have leaked it. And Wilson was in the State Dept.

Someone who did not like Wilson, perhaps?


370 posted on 07/16/2005 8:09:21 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
The Lefties ultimate target is Bush. Peter Fein's assertion is more evidence of the spread of Moore's Disease throuhgout the Democratic Party. Never mind the absence of any real evidence linking Bush to a leak. To the Left, its enough that he's perceived as dangerous to America that's all that's needed to establish a connection. Besides, its not the evidence or lack of it that matters, its the seriousness of the charge.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
371 posted on 07/16/2005 8:16:23 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

If the Vice President succeeds the president with less than half of the term for which he was elected remaining, then he could then run for two more terms. The maximum time any president can serve under these circumstances is ten years. However, it's not going to happen.


372 posted on 07/16/2005 8:47:48 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Anybody who thinks that George W. Bush has done ANYTHING that requires a resignation is NOT a Republican or a conservative, period.

I am a conservative and a Republican and I believe that Bush's failure to effectively defend our borders (provide for the common defense) could serve as a prima facia cause for his resignation or expulsion from office. His signing of McCain's CFR, one of the most aggregious assaults on free speech in US history, could easliy suffice as charge number two. With the SCOTUS busy trampling upon private property rights, looks like GW has a lot of company.

373 posted on 07/16/2005 8:47:52 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

You can "believe" you're the King of England; doesn't make it true.


374 posted on 07/16/2005 8:50:27 PM PDT by Howlin (Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

My use of the term "believe" implies that I have though it through, and come to a conclusion, as many conservatives have also done. Perhaps you are not in tune with currrent events? PS: Your arguments would be better served were you to resist your usual impulse for launching simplistic ad-hominem attacks.


375 posted on 07/16/2005 8:57:03 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
as many conservatives have also done.

Not as many as you'd love to claim though; "the base" is sticking with Bush.

And if I was interested in your critique of my posting habits, I would have asked for it.

376 posted on 07/16/2005 9:00:55 PM PDT by Howlin (Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

LOL! You nailed it.


377 posted on 07/16/2005 9:12:29 PM PDT by RustysGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

For that particular Grand Jury.


378 posted on 07/16/2005 9:13:54 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

We have a Winner!!!!!!!!


379 posted on 07/16/2005 9:25:33 PM PDT by Atchafalaya (When you're there that's the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter

I trust Karl Rove, NOT Peter Fenn, and certainly NOT Pat Buchanon.

Let the democRATS bitch, piss, moan and complain all over the place, and then we can sit back and watch them implode.....AGAIN !! Just imagine the embarrassment of self destruction with the whole world watching, and just in time for the 2006 elections. I can see the Republican commercials now........hehehehe


380 posted on 07/16/2005 9:33:15 PM PDT by GeorgeW23225 (Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-409 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson