Replies

I'm glad Cong. Tancredo is serving in the United States House of Representatives.

The citizens of the United States of American have been stabbed in the back by both President Clinton and President Bush. President Clinton talked about his commitment to a secure United States. President Bush has also spoke about this. However, both presidents have allowed millions of illegal aliens to unlawfully enter into this country. Both presidents have allowed millions of foreign nationals to remain in this country after their visas expired without being deported. On September 11, 2001, several illegal alien Islamic terrorists particiapted in the murder over three thousand (3,000) Americans. Those illegal aliens should have been deported before they had an opportunity to mureder thousands of Americans.

President Bush supports a program to give legal status to millions of illegal aliens. Once accepted into the program, the former illegal aliens would be allowed to immediately, with an employer's sponsorship, begin applying for a U.S. green card, which allows permanent residency.

Instead of rewarding illegal aliens with legal status as President Bush seeks to do, this nation should be securing and enforcing its borders, prosecuting employers that hire illegal aliens and making a serious effort to deport the illegal aliens in this country.

Cong. Tancredo never advocated a nuclear attack on Mecca during the interview. He mentioned "tak[ing] out their holy sites." He said "[y]eah" to a follow-up question clarifying whether he was "talking about bombing Mecca."
You could bomb Mecca with conventional weapons. You could take out holy sites with conventional weapons. The host had given Cong. Tancredo a hypothetical situation of Islamic terrorists exploding nuclear devices in six (6), seven (7) or eight (8) U.S. cities. If such an attack upon the United States seemed imminent, I would not have a problem with a threat being made by the president to use conventional weapons against Mecca if that attack occurred.
Further, if that hypothetical did occur and millions upon millions of Americans were dead, I certainly would not have a problem with attacking Mecca with conventional weapons if such a warning had been given.

Cong. Tancredo never advocated a nuclear attack on Mecca during the interview. He mentioned "tak[ing] out their holy sites." He said "[y]eah" to a follow-up question clarifying whether he was "talking about bombing Mecca."
You could bomb Mecca with conventional weapons.

Or you could just drop pigs on them. For the first strike, to let them know that the second one is do-able.

There'd be squeals of protest, of course: from the pro-islumists, from the PETA animal-worshipers, and from the ordnance on their way down, of course.

Technical problems relating to having the animals mess up the interior of expensive USAF cargo aircraft could be overcome either by tranquilizing the critters and dropping them via palletload, or by attaching bombrack fittings to the porkers and fitting them externally on tactical aircraft- once they get above 12000 feet or so, lack of oxygen will put their porky little lights right out. But once they've done their job, they ought to get a medal.