Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill
Hey, tobyhill - is this what you mean by 'stumbling over himself?'

WILSON: "I've never said it was the vice president who sent me. It's clear in the article. And, indeed, it's clear in an interview that you did with me last year. And if you run the tape on that, you'll see that what the statement that they used was chopped out of the...

BLITZER: But, basically, you still hold to the notion that the whole idea of sending someone to Niger originated in the Vice President's Office?

WILSON: No, no, no, no, no. The idea of sending someone to Niger originated in response to a request from the Office of the Vice President -- that's how I was briefed -- that required an answer.

The decision was made by the operations people at the CIA, after a meeting that I had with the analytical community, to ask me if I would go and help answer some of the questions that still remained so that we would better understand the situation."

Or is it this you are talking about?

BLITZER: All right. So at least you agree -- and I know you have in the past as well -- that the vice president never directly asked you to go or asked that anyone go, namely his staff just wanted some answers and it was the CIA's decision to then send -- dispatch -- someone to try to get some firsthand information?

WILSON: That's correct. And I've said that in my op-ed, and I've said it in an interview here, and I've said it every time since.

Yeah. Sounds like he was really contradicting himself.

226 posted on 07/15/2005 4:13:24 PM PDT by lugsoul ("She talks and she laughs." - Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
If you believe Wilson just say that. I saw the interview and with 5 no's before an answer, that's stumbling. With inconsistencies from previous claims, that's stumbling. For someone who has never met Cheney, he sure was briefed a lot about what Cheney wanted.
229 posted on 07/15/2005 4:24:52 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: lugsoul
Out of curiosity, do you think Wilson has lied about any of his role in this leak?

Do you think Plame was covert or fit in the definition of covert as applied to the law?

Do you think Rove leaked the name?

Why do you act antagonistic on every post you participate on?

Is your mind so convinced one way that no matter what is produced as in evidence you can counter it?

I have no problem with people disagreeing but when that disagreement has no points other than to be antagonistic I would just prefer not discussing any matter with that person.
237 posted on 07/15/2005 4:47:46 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson