[BlessedByLiberty]

Good point. I did not think of the 5th Amendment protection.

Who is the NYTimes protecting? We should list requirements to qualify for their protection:

1. Must be liberal/socialist
2. Must be anti-AMERICAN
3. Must be qualified propagandist/liar
4. Must be tied to the MSM umbilical cord
5. Must have access to classified information
6. Must have access to personnel/personal files (FBI, etc.)
7. Must be dedicated to the destruction of the Bush Administration
8. Must...

[edcoil]

1. Must be liberal/socialist
2. Must be anti-AMERICAN
3. Must be qualified propagandist/liar
4. Must be tied to the MSM umbilical cord
5. Must have access to classified information
6. Must have access to personnel/personal files (FBI, etc.)
7. Must be dedicated to the destruction of the Bush Administration
8. Must...

OK, I'll guess. Sandy Burger
Maybe why he stole secret documents.

[Poincare]

It's David Corn who was informed by Wilson.

[justshutupandtakeit]

She could invoke the Fifth but the GJ can just waive any self-incrimination and force her testimony anyway. This is how Momo Giancana was thrown into jail during the 60s provoking an undying and deadly hatred of the Kennedy administration.

[justshutupandtakeit]

I love your list of insinuations but see no evidence that Senator Fat Ankles was involved. Schumer looks more likely.

[anoldafvet]

If I didn't know better, I'd say you just described Hillary.

[Nevermore]

Who is the NYTimes protecting? We should list requirements to qualify for their protection: 1. Must be liberal/socialist 2. Must be anti-AMERICAN 3. Must be qualified propagandist/liar 4. Must be tied to the MSM umbilical cord 5. Must have access to classified information 6. Must have access to personnel/personal files (FBI, etc.) 7. Must be dedicated to the destruction of the Bush Administration

Sounds like a Clinton to me!