Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Hill
And she also doesn't want to let Rove off the hook. As long as this can play, the media thinks it will damage Rove. So it's win-win for the NY Times. The truth be damned.

It is a big lose-lose for the NYT. The liberals, and their media whores including the NYT have already utterly lost this Valerie Plame battle against President Bush and Karl Rove like they were utterly defeated in all the other battles they have engaged with President Bush and Karl Rove for the 4 1/2 years.

141 posted on 07/15/2005 12:52:52 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: jveritas

It'll stick with the 80% of the populace who only scan the headlines at the checkout counter.

Why is Reagan's cabinet still referred to as the most corrupt ever? Because Richard Allen accepted a $75 watch from the Japanese?

Even if the NYT wrote a retraction (and didn't bury it, as they usually do), the damage has been done. So it's win-win.


146 posted on 07/15/2005 12:58:23 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson