To: jonrick46
I'm beginning to think that is exactly what this is/was about.
185 posted on
07/18/2005 8:03:19 AM PDT by
Howlin
(Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
To: Howlin
186 posted on
07/18/2005 8:16:22 AM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Howlin
"I am inclined to suspect that the Ambassador was the source, and that the NY Times (and its readers) where misled by the reporting of what is, in Mr. Kristof's view and that of the Washington Post, still a newsworthy story."
I also find this statement very interesting as it relates to Wilson's personality. It appears that Wilson is a very defensive person so when Kristof advised Wilson that his story was not adding up, did Wilson then come back and try to defend himself by saying,"check with my wife, she works on WMD at the CIA"?
187 posted on
07/18/2005 8:26:12 AM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Howlin
The Special Prosecuter, Fitzgerald may be on to something that may cause real harm to the DemonRATS. If Valerie used her CIA connections to leak something that would hurt President Bush's reelection, we would have a major crime. Judith Miller may be hiding information that points the finger at Valerie's efforts to use her CIA connections to hurt President Bush. The New York Times certainly would not want any such revelation to be made. It would put a dagger in the heart of the DemonRATS!
Since Joe Wilson's venture to Niger produced no information, how then did he get the forged documents which were classified? Such documents were forged to hide the fact that France was helping Saddam Hussein acquire the uranium from Niger. The possession of such documents, even if they were forged, is the possession of classified information and a crime. Fitzgerald may be getting the facts together for a major blow to the DemonRATS.
One last question: If Saddam Hussein did acquire uranium, where is it now?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson