If you want to contend she wasn't NOC, fine - go ahead. Her former supervisor is quoted in the Wash Times saying she was. A former colleague (Larry Johnson) says she was. If you want to call them liars or claim you have some proof that she wasn't NOC, go ahead. But, given that fact that disclosure of details of her cover would likely effect a lot of folks other than her, I doubt you will ever see whatever definitive proof you want to see of her cover. The CIA made a criminal referral - which would be completely frivolous if she wasn't covert at least at some point. The SP has been investigating it for two years. I doubting that there is 'no evidence' she was NOC.
Testimony of people like Larry Johnson doesn't impress me. The fact that her supervisor said it was legit just makes me ask why he wasn't fired. It was the worst cover possible: a company with no phyisical location, a single employee, and no product or service. Anybody who looked her up at the time she was supposedly covered would find nothing, then they would notice that she lives near the CIA in VA instead of Boston, and would easily guess the rest.